[theunify]

Originally Posted by 5589 A grand unified theory is useful to those in physics, not life. A meaningful TOE would apply to all things. Otherwise it should be called a TOST (theory of some things). Everyone in 5th grade should be able to understand a true TOE. Sure, there's a now. But I believe it is impossible to know what it is. We can only perceive what is outside of the Now. This not only applies to our sun or other stars whose image is at least 8 minutes old but to the house across the street, as well. Granted, the amount of 'time' the representation takes to get to us is miniscule, but it is still outside the 'now' nonetheless. Same applies to our noses when we look at it. Flucidity Theory maintains that everything we perceive is a representation of its truer (imperceptible) nature. What would happen if we tried to perceive the inherently vast and unlimited with limited perceptual tools? It would be broken down into manageable pieces, ready for consumption at our own pace. Thus the universe. I'm not sure why most of us assume, unreasonably so perhaps, that a true TOE is going to come out of a laboratory or university. As we know, a true TOE should apply to all things and be applicable across all disciplines, not just the limited space of a laboratory. I would even suggest that is the reason none has yet been discovered and made known. Flucidity Theory can be simple or complex, depending upon what is required. The basic elements of existence, too, can be simple or complex, depending.

The mind is a laboratory, you need to make us feel the "repeatability" of your theory first, IMHO.