[theunify]

Originally Posted by dleviwing theunify; Time is only relevant within a dynamic environment. To say that “spatial distances = time increments” is pure nonsense. The 3 spatial dimensions have no relevance to the time dimension until one attempts to define relative motion. Here are some online physics books you can refer to on the subject of Relativity. (book 6) http://lightandmatter.com/

David, I'm dumbfounded, I meant spatial distances = time increments of the clocks. As in the hands of the clock. Please reread, I am sure I mentioned the word clock.

Spacial distance => does not imply motion.