Quote:
Originally Posted by dleviwing  The problem with using the words “forces” or “fields” is that they are meaningless until you specify a field of something like a field of clover. Though we have several adjectives for these words, as yet, there is no experimental work stating what any of the forces are, only how they work; so we say we know the forces because we know their behavior. Since the same is true for our knowledge of fundamental matter, why not just say that the forces are interactions of fundamental matter in differing states of existence or form and work from there? |
The difference between the amount of libraries on theoretical research and the libraries on laboratory field work are never going to be equal. I myself was on the road to becoming a technician of science and have many lab books to prove it; however I found myself preoccupied with math which seems more fundamental than factory