Quote:
Originally Posted by vacuum-mechanics  Dear Robert,
Up to now the forum is already ALIVE! Not just an ordinary but an energetic one. I am quite confident and think that main part of the members would agree, wouldn’t they?
By the way, I agree with Bottomlander& Mkirkpatrick comment about how mainstream physicists approach to TOE. For my addition opinion, the worst thing is that they totally ignore philosophy; the process of “cause and effect” (the fundamental definition of philosophy). How could someone who works in science achieve TOE with out philosophy? How could they trust in mathematics (created by man) than in physics - science of nature (created by god)?
One obvious example that reflects their idea is the concept of “three-dimension curve space”. All physicists accept that they can not visualize how the space is curve! But they think that it is true ONLY because of mathematics and experiment. Of course we accept in experiment and mathematics, but it doesn’t mean that it is true that space is curve. In my paper “Completed Einstein general theory of relativity”, we will easily see that we could understand “how space is curve” by using scientific concept (not just an idea which was blamed by mainstreamers). Please wait for few weeks
Sincerely,
Nimit Th. |
VM Nimit,it is good to see you back with us,please return again very soon.
regards michael.