Quote:
Originally Posted by adamgf  The point of establishing Lorentz covariance in my paper is to show that the postulates of special relativity are not violated for a spacelike Minkowski spacetime. That is the speed of light c is the same for all inertial frames of reference. |
That is exactly my point, nothing you have said strikes me as new; sure we can argue about what is the best mathematical approach to represent antimatter, I do not think simply saying "psuedo sphere" or "negative curvature" really implies meanings beyond shrodinger's make believe world of formlessness. In essence you are not describing reality with your equations, bringing on serious long term questions of "schizophrenia", is this what you want foryouself? I do not think so, so next time you post something and you disregard completely the reservations I am making you do so at the risk of your own sanity.
Simply put a sphere with negative curvature in space-time is simply a cube with a sphere cut out of the middle of it so that the sphere has 4 points on the surface of this box. is that what you mean by ixc? or -ixc? IF you answer yes than a simple lorentzian transformation is insufficient proof that this box-sphere shape does indeed "travel" and if you do not define the non-continuous motions of matter, then your equations for anti-matter are just a clever rip off of current "relative" continuous theories.
You should be sorry, you are light years away from knowing why brush strokes of math are unneccasary unless new fundemental concepts go along with it.