Theory of Everything - View Single Post

vacuum-mechanics · **Re: What is Lorentz transformation? -** 02-07-2007, 05:26 PM

Dear Lloyd Gillespie and friends,

Thank you for the information. And I fell that anyone who read the old day’s science text books would found that scientists in the old day had said something which is useful for the progression of today’s science toward tomorrow. The reason is that their idea was based on “the reality of the nature”, not on an imaginary thinking!

By the way, in my opinion any mathematical formula in science was used for explaining natural phenomena, it is not physics itself! It must be able to understand in reality; otherwise it may lead to be interpreted to be something crazy. Like in the case of Lorentz transformation which was used (in Einstein special theory of relativity) without understanding of its physical meaning, what we got is the wrong interpretation of “the increasing of mass, time dilation and length contraction”!

Another best example is the wave equation in quantum mechanics which is very important and very useful, but was interpreted to be some thing which could not be imagine by human being! Instead if we could understand its physical meaning, then what we will get is something realistic and explainable. And its physical meaning will be given in my next paper “completed quantum mechanical theory”, please wait to see.

Sincerely,
Nimit Th.

	(#10 (permalink))
vacuum-mechanics Green Belt Status: Offline Posts: 57 Thanks Given: 2 Thanked 13x in 10 Posts Join Date: May 2004 Rep Power: 16	Re: What is Lorentz transformation? - 02-07-2007, 05:26 PM Dear Lloyd Gillespie and friends, Thank you for the information. And I fell that anyone who read the old day’s science text books would found that scientists in the old day had said something which is useful for the progression of today’s science toward tomorrow. The reason is that their idea was based on “the reality of the nature”, not on an imaginary thinking! By the way, in my opinion any mathematical formula in science was used for explaining natural phenomena, it is not physics itself! It must be able to understand in reality; otherwise it may lead to be interpreted to be something crazy. Like in the case of Lorentz transformation which was used (in Einstein special theory of relativity) without understanding of its physical meaning, what we got is the wrong interpretation of “the increasing of mass, time dilation and length contraction”! Another best example is the wave equation in quantum mechanics which is very important and very useful, but was interpreted to be some thing which could not be imagine by human being! Instead if we could understand its physical meaning, then what we will get is something realistic and explainable. And its physical meaning will be given in my next paper “completed quantum mechanical theory”, please wait to see. Sincerely, Nimit Th.