Hi Tony, I had a message all composed, but my computer crashed, so here's what it was with a little extra, in my e-mail to Alexander;
Hi Alexander S. Zarzerskiy, I have recently finished reading your entire site of excellent ideas and math. I also just posted about you to members on our site; http://www.toequest.com/forum/ Below is a message I answered to one of our physicists, Tony Stanton, about a new theory of True Relativity, as he calls it. It's a classical model of 3D space, fields and gravity. It may be of interest to you. I'd like to know if you have had success publishing your ideas with any reputable physics organizations, as I feel your ideas of immediate value. Also, do you have a community of physicists/mathematicians to work with? I would further like to invite you to join us at ToeQuest, if you have the stamina for contending views, as we allow all ideas, to flush out the true. I am one of the moderators, and we have several good physicists, mathematicians and philosophers, etc. We'd be humbled to have you join us... Sincerely, Lloyd Gillespie Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony Stanton  I have created a mathematical theory of three dimensional spacetime that can match Newtonian gravity within the confines of the solar system where we know the effect of gravity to be true. I would like to hear your comments on such a radical theory. Some of you may already have heard of it but this is my latest version. The theory is called True Relativity and can be found here. Tony |
Hi Tony, I think you have some very good fundamental work. I am still processing your pdf on TR. At this moment I would like to tell you, your information is corroborated by Alexander Zazerskiy's work. He's a physicist/mathematician from Latvia. His main work is using classical kinematics to model the electron containing its own self-contained field, and sub-quantum field, vs., dragging. I think his mathematics may be of great use to you, as he has tracked out where the early classical math was corrupted by Max Born, and others upon Minkowsky's death, and also my mention of the Solvay Conference of 1910,
http://www.toequest.com/forum/t-q-physics-alliance/2120-universal-evolution-3.html etc., on the same history of ideas.
[the Solvay information is down this page a bit, titled, On the Co-creation of Classical and Modern Physics.] I would advise you to read his entire site, as he's been publishing, through his children's interpretations, into English and French. It may take reading the entire site, as I have, to put all the facts together accurately. He has solved the Maxwell-Lorentz equations, and Levi-Civita's kinematics of fluids further, or completely. His math directly relates to proofs of your field ideas. He's located at;
http://www.ltn.lv/~elefzaze/
I think we're finally getting somewhere...
Good luck,
Lloyd