[WillieB]

I am still keeping it simple but, even when I am playing golf my mind wanders to find more areas in which the characteristics of the IU offer a potential explanation of a phenomenon for which no credible explanation previously existed. This time electrical resistance, conductivity, and superconductivity have come to the fore. I know that what follows is not perfect in its presentation. Let’s work together to improve it.
The conductivity of any conductor is measured by the capability of its constituent atoms and molecules to freely adjust the polarizations and orientations of the flows and spins of their increments so that the resistance to the movement of the passing electrons is minimized. Conversely resistance is measured by the inability the material to readjust the polarizations and orientations of its constituent atoms and molecules so that the freedom of movement of the passing electrons is impeded. The resistance to the movement of the electrons increases the rate of contacts between unlike increments of like spin which results in mutual annihilations and increases the presence of free pb’s which are not associated in the orbits of the increments. Part D, item 9 of the second edition of the paper deals with the nature of temperature and heat. It pointed out that temperature rises due to an increase in the presence of or density of free pb’s. The existence of an electrical current in a conductor will increase the rate of contacts between unlike increments of like spin and thus will increase the rate of their mutual annihilation and the density of the unassociated pb’s. These free pb’s will be “batted around” by any passing increments including those associated in bonds to form the electrons involved in the electrical current and will serve to further increase the resistance of the conductor.
What happens to the orbits of the increments as a result of their contacts with the free pb’s? It is posited that the radii of the orbits, and hence the volume of the increment, actually increases. Hence as the density of the free pb’s increases the number and duration of contacts between increments also increases. Conversely, as temperature drops the number and duration of contacts between increments decreases. (And, perhaps the velocity of the increments’ orbits decreases. After all, we know that a photon of light can actually be brought to a stationary state at absolute zero.) These conditions hold true for both the increments of the electrons forming the current as well as the increments composing the electrons and hadrons of the material of the conductor. At some point the temperature will reach a point which allows a reduction of the volume of the increments and in contacts between increments to the extent which permits a perfect polarization of the conductor’s increments as well as those composing the electrons of the current. This condition eliminates contacts between unlike increments of like spin and eliminates the presence of free pb’s.
A current in a superconductor is known to repel an “invading” magnetic field. The perfect polarization present in the conductor rejects any polarizations externally imposed and thus the effect of the magnetic field is nullified.
Any thoughts? Any suggestions?