View Single Post
Re: A Perspective of Absolute Perception...
Old
  (#7 (permalink))
Lloyd Gillespie
9th degree Black Belt
Lloyd Gillespie has a spectacular aura about
 
Lloyd Gillespie's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,579
Thanks Given: 114
Thanked 45x in 43 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rep Power: 26
   
Re: A Perspective of Absolute Perception... - 02-14-2007, 11:08 PM

Now, let's see what can be further deduced from this virtual absolute perception. Since it allows such a bird's eye view of the entire evolutionary processes of the universe, it may be far more promising, than I had first realised. Let's use this virtual Q perspective to entirely dis-assemble the total finite universe, down to its absolute sub-quantum fundamental substance. First, can this be done? I say, yes it can!

1.Let's take light first. Light exists as em radiation. As far as we know it's first origin is from the first singularity explosion, better known as the big-bang. Quantum mechanics states its velocity at this first event was somewhere around c*2^20ms[meters/second]. If this be so, we know that all light of the known universe is slowing, so, if it is slowing, that means it will slow all the way to the tG^tG perspective point. Let's arbitrarily set that velocity at c^-tGms, a very minimal velocity. Such velocity would be compatible with other properties of the sub-quantum fundamental substance, that will be developed in the following points.
2.Next, let's take electrons, protons and neutrons, etc., as they relate closely to the slowing of light. We already know the numbers exist for total radiation decay of all finiteness, at some 10^137 years, so what happens on this long journey? Since Q exists far beyond this light/radiation decay point, with our virtual perception, we should be able to witness the total dis-integration of all electrons, protons and neutrons, at the edge of their respective radiation decay cones. As the velocity of their mass/gravity slows, their pseudo-shells[for particle physicists] will begin to be weakened, and their internal velocities will start to radiate out, as the entire singularity releases all its velocity energy, heading to tG^tG point. Somewhere between 10^100 years and tG^tG years, all its mass/gravity velocity energy will have dissipated into the absolute fundamental sub-quantum substance, since it's all mass/gravity velocity wave/substance density to begin with.
3.Next, let's take a look at the uncertainty principle, as it also decays, or slows down, so we may be able to see inside its workings. The uncertainty principle decays to the slow motions of the absolute certainty principle of fundamental substance, at the edge of the decay cones, also. Looking inside it is the same as looking at points 1. & 2.
4.Vacuum has an interesting journey, as well. Many have theorized where vacuum comes from, and I dis-agree with all present theories. I say vacuum was produced and is maintained by the initial hot big-bang explosion, and its continueing expansion. Others state that all space is a vacuum, and I dis-agree with this also, here's why. Since 1. 2. & 3. points already deal with all finite universal decay, the vacuum would also have a finite cone of existence. As the finite universe decays into the sub-quantum fundamental substance, the vacuum dis-appears completely from the universe, somewhere between 10^137 years to tG^tG years. Thus, vacuum is a finite substance space of the total infinite universe. Q vision's absolute tG^tG point exists far beyond any such vacuum space, in the absolute fundamental sub-quantum substance space.
5.Electricity is a substance of substance velocity radiation. Classical, quantum and relative physics have never accounted for its fundamental causes, completely. If we look at Carver Mead's "Collective Electrodynamics", he offers a very simple example of quantum electrodynamics, in a continueous loop super-conductive storage condensor ring. The wave aspect of electricity extends backward and forward in time. Could this be its link to the sub-quantum world? I say yes, it is, but as 1. 2. 3. & 4. points show, electricity must also decay, as it's of the motion of substance, and all finite motion is decaying, along with electricity, that most famous of love's of quantum physicists. In the final analyses electricity decays to its minimal state motions, say c^-tGcm, in the absolute sub-quantum fundamental substance.
6.Weak and strong nuclear forces are of the fission and fusion states of finite motions, first created in the big-bang, and other stars, black holes etc. As of 1. to 5., these also must decay to the absolute ground state of fundamental substance.
7.Mass and gravity, which have mystified physicists for centuries, also must decay, to the absolute sub-quantum fundamental state of substance at tG^tG. Since mass and gravity are equivalent as the velocity densities of all substances, we can add them into the decay picture as per above, nothing special, just decay of fundamental velocities of substance/matter.
8.Aether is an interesting phenomena that's been with us since the Upanishads and early Greeks. Many particle physicists don't accept the existence of the aether, but most quantum and classical physicists do. The particle physicists had better start explaining comet tails' motions, if they can't accept the aether. The aether also must decay, as it exists only to the edge of the radiation and light cones, beyond cmbr, but still does not stand when 1. through 7. have decayed to the fundamental substance, and again somewhere between 10^137 years and tG^tG years hence.
9.All quantumization of space must also decay into the fundamental linear non-quantumized sub-quantum motions of fundamental substance, at the distant Q point, and at minimal velocity of c^-tGcm. Notice I'm not stopping the one degree of freedom of motion, yet.
10.Relativity is no more than the total velocities of mass densities under discussion. Since it's only a measurement, decay isn't an issue, but at least we can see through all its metaphysical illusions.
11.Minkowsky, Setterfield and Einstein Quantumized space all decay into infinite fundamental non-quantumized sub-quantum linear substance space.
12.Time, being just a measure of substance distance is just our abstract understanding in the real world. All understanding decays into the absolute fundamental mechanical substance.
13.Temperature, last of all temperature, the tricky substance, or is it? We know it most as hot and cold. It's always been with us and the universe. As of the finite universe, I define it as heat, even the 3.7k of deep space. As of 1. through 12. all heat must decay from the universe, when all other motions decay, but this leaves us with only one entity that does not decay___cold___it increases with decay___the only thing that increases, with all of total finite decay. So what is this magic element? What are its powers?

Of all the tools at absolute fundamental sub-quantum linear substance's disposal, to rebuild another universe___what has the power to do such a thing? The sub-quantum theory of universal evolution___cold___the prime mover! Just as cold, i.e., temperature, i.e., thermodynamics, freezes water and creates massive energy potential with ice, the opposite thermodynamic force, heat, boils water into steam and creates massive energy potential, thermodynamics' hydrodynamics is our mystery universe builder___the only prime self-mover of all decay options. It's powers only increase as we exaggerate its 0k temperature, at the tG^tG years and temperature point of 0k^-tG degrees___the absolute prime mover of sub-quantum absolute linear substance!

Regards,
Lloyd


"To develop the skill of correct thinking is in the first place to learn what you have to disregard. In order to go on, you have to know what to leave out; this is the essence of effective thinking." Kurt Godel
"Time and space are modes in which we think and not conditions in which we live." Albert Einstein
"The uncertainty principle is an absolute, finite, universal constant." L.G.
"The tick-tick-tick of the cesium atom is a sliding-time-scaler constant of all finite universal motion." L.G.
  
Reply With Quote