Quote:
Originally Posted by bottomlander  Unlike other terms being popular only recently, antimatter alreadybeen used with a long history, since 1928. The usage of antimater is within mainstream physics and standard modle of elementary particles.
As in wikipedia, Positron is the antiparticle or the antimatter counterpart of the electron. All elementary particles have their own anti-particles. Photon has itself being its antiparticle. They are different only regarding their charges.
Anyhow, why antimatter is so scarce in our nearby galaxies are still open for rival explanations.
In case more differences upon the properties of matter are helpful to build a model, better to coin other new words rather than giving a new meaning to antimatter. This will cause troubles to semantics. Unfortunately, dark matter also got its specific usuage already!
Regards. bottomlander |
We need to graph and map a new topology algorithm between our sub-quantum language systems and quantum language systems. Just as string theory is no more than another gauge theory, in a long list of quantum and sub-quantum gauge theories, loosely connected by symmetries, smoothnesses, renormalizations, etc., quantum theory also qualifies for a list of theories loosely string/strung together, yet still describing much of our real world. We need new algorithms to merge all theories, and fundamental forces. I will state a fact for hot dispute;
"The 5th force of nature, hydrodynamics, is the absolute and total mechanics of the entire universe, uniting all the four forces of nature, including all scientific analytic thought, and the natural perceptual mind." This also would equal the TOE or FOE[facts of everything]... The hydrodynamic compression/expansion topological algorithm of the universe___what is it...?
Regards,
Lloyd