| We do experiments to discover what happens.
Then model what happens.
We accumulate facts as probabilities of outcomes.
A generalized learning algorithum can be applied.
Generalizations are tested to determine the domain where they apply.
I try like mad to not have any theories but have very stong views on most everything.
All theories I know of have been falsified.
I suppose my current molel is a theory, but it is more like an intermediate result, I seek the simplest machine that accounts for the data by Occham's razor.
It is difficult to prove as it necessarily agrees with the data. All I can do is show how it agrees with both quantum and relativistic effects and hope to find collaborators as much o mathimatics and science must be reformulated in each new model.
I do need to deign experiments where the standard model is incomplete and the new model gets more complete results.
But I don't have a theory really, I just have known relationships unencombered by human ideas of how things ought to be. What emerges is an information system model, and like magic, nature appears to obey information rules. The constraints of our world appear to be logical, not physical. Only nature is the authority. All physical theories have anomolies and are therefore invalidated.
Jim  |