[baudrunner]

No, they do not appear to be of the same area, Ismenia. If you'll take a closer look at my first post, there is a structure very close to the square bunker-like object in the upper left that does not show in the 'face' formation photograph. This is definitely a different region altogether.

Also, would you scale down your images a little and/or convert them to a smaller .jpg file so that they load faster and so that we don't have to scroll right to see all of them? Be a little more considerate. We get the picture.

Oh, wait, it just occurs to me that you are comparing only your images. If that's the case then I have to say that the source of my photo claims that it is unretouched. The face photos, with the exception of the 'big' one, appear to be retouched. Still, that is an interesting formation that suggests that it is indeed an artificially sculpted formation. And I'm talking perhaps tens of thousands of years ago so any erosion effects would appear to be normal.