[Lloyd Gillespie]

Hi MJA, I'll post a few answers inside your post to your questions.

Originally Posted by MJA

Lloyd, if you don't mind only a couple more questions.

Both? You can think or take two paths in opposite directions at the same time? [Yes, the mind is capable of just such actions. That's the fundamental actions of all theorizing.]
Do you switch from increasing knowledge to decreasing knowledge randomly or simultaniously? [Both, and each.]

Known and Unknown? Measure is both certain and uncertain, Simultaniously? [Of course, the measurments we know for certain, and the measurements we theorize about.]
Is that how physics measures nature with Newtonian certainty and QM probability or astro and nano measure at the same time? [Would you know of any other ways? We use all the tools available.] Is science thinking and walking two different path at the same time, and is that tearing science apart? [Yes, it is always thinking and walking two different paths at the same time, but it certainly doesn't tear competant minds apart. Competant minds are analytically capable of functioning on many levels, at once.]

Study ALL? If all and I and nature are one, what then would you suggest I study, study, study? And if not the same, where would I or one find a class on the nature of all? [If one studies "I" thoroughly, and understands "I" completely, you still have to know the language to communicate, in the fields of your interests, thus after knowing "I" completely, then study the interests, that link the fields of your personal interests, so you can become fluent in the dialogue of the sciences you will choose to communicate to others.]

Thanks
MJA

Lloyd