| Re: "theory Of Bonding Harmonics" -
04-02-2007, 11:03 AM
Both of you are very welcome!
Yes, David, It has been a long way from the very first days I thought that science could be in some way "impossed" to others without evidences and arguments... It took me a long time to find the right conexion between "TIME" and "MATTER" in a way that physics could also help to explain what's missing in at the heart of chemistry.
To be honest with both of you.... It was just like a miracle.
I was afraid that people would start looking at the symbol of "Ying and Yang" and began to imagine: -"Here is another foul with more metaphysics..."
David, I found that is that ancient symbol what represents SYMMETRY and everything it stands for. I simply included [I believe for the very first time in a serious theory] their holistic meannings and their nature of equal symmetry on both sides to describe atomic and nuclear shells as well.
I've received once a very stimulant evaluation from a scientist whose name I prefer to keep in the anonimate for obvious reasons, This person is a chinese origin physicist who had been awarded many times in China and the U.S.A. for his work in different fileds.
I never thought that a person with those credentials would spend time in reading a theory without any equations to justify its arguments, but he did and his kind words were more than enough to me.
I'm very optimist that this time who knows... perhaps something good could come out of this... Time will say.
Thanks both of you. Mike you've always been so stimulant to everyone with a new idea no matter how impossible it may seems.... David, you've always been honest and straight forward in your evaluations. I admired you and I appreciate your comments very much.
HUMANBYDEFAULT |