[humanbydefault]

Today, I'd like to discuss another conclusion extracted from my theory. A highly controversial I may add but an important piece of physics to give you a different optical point about how present theories "see" the 'electron' and how "Bonding Harmonics' approaches the very same argument in a 360 degress angle:

The following was quoted from wikipedia:

"One consequence of the generalized uncertainty principle is that the spin projection operators (which measure the spin along a given direction like x, y, or z), cannot be measured simultaneously. Physically, this means that it is ill defined what axis a particle is spinning about. A measurement of the z-component of spin destroys any information about the x and y components that might previously have been obtained."

It was referred to the theoretical incompatibility that represents the presence of an 'orbiting charged particle' [electron] around atomic shells while having "half-spin" properties.

You are well aware that due to experimental observation [Zeeman Effect] It was undenieably observed, measured and proved the existence of a 1/2 spin phenomenon along the ORBITAL MOMENTUM. My theory abide by that observation too but in a different sense. For today's physicists that 1/2 spin feature is inherently part of the nature of an alleged particle [electron] said to orbit the shell.

In "Bonding Harmonics" (as you have access to read in our Forum's library archive) Those 1/2 spins are "vibrational patterns or harmonics" along the ORBITAL MOMENTUM [Ying and Yang].
The inaccurate 'spinning-electro-particle model' can not explain the obvious INSTANTANEOUS nature of chemical bonds between neighboring atoms in a time-sequential mechanism as seen in my theory.

In simpler words: Assuming 'electrons' did in fact orbit shells with a 1/2 spin magnetic momentum, how could they be in 4 (four) different places at the same time?

Yes.... at the same time. Our reality is 3 dimensional [unless you have a different version....] that's why it is highly CONVENIENT to blame to 'UNCERTAINTY' something that so far "they" don't have a good answer to justify.

According to history, Paul Dirac considered the 'electron' a "point-particle" from the geometrical point of view... I agree! If we could "see" [that we can't] a 'free electron' moving along the vaccum that's the closest representation to its shape. My theory proves it with diagrams. Not just a 'free electron' but also 'an electric charge' flowing across a wire [as electricity] present such 'symmetrically PERFECT configuration of a spin-zero particle'.

A different thing is the picture in atomic shells. 'Free electron' and 'electric charges' are a PRODUCT of enegy being TRANSFORMED into a perfect symmetrical 'particle' inside what I called "quantum envelopes."

There is [right now] an article in the very front page of this forum that announces some experiments done on atomic shells of Noble gases producing an 'ionization' and the scattering of 'free electrons'. All they have done is 'activate' the "Quantum Envelope" that exists in every atomic shell in a time-sequential manner facilitating the production or modulation of one 'free electron.'

I wonder if there is anyone in the forum interested in this subject or if you like to discuss further some of the aspects concerning this theoretical part....

HUMANBYDEFAULT