[purveyor of knowledge]

Thanks for the reply Graybeard,

There is no difference between a Grand Unified Theory and a Theory of Everything. It kills me because wikipedia has three entries for the same thing!!! Truthfully you cannot unify the four fundamental forces without discovering something more basic, fundamnetal, and awe-inspiring about our universe. You cannot have one and not the other. You cannot have a GUT without a TOE. They are two words for the same thing.

At the most basic level time, consciousness, energy and light are all identities of the same singular enigma. I agree it seems hard to have a theory that describes everything perfectly. But know this, when I say that 1/0=everything, I have just described everything perfectly as a singular enigma of time, consciousness, energy and light! So you see, it can really be done and I have just shown you how. Yeah I know it's amazing, but whatever. It ain't nothing like the symbol I'm about to show you.

Now I know this is going to be a lot of information for you to absorb all at once but don't let that scare you because what you stand to gain is sheer unbelievable knowledge of everything as a functional symbol. Once you have a perfect description of everything, as a functional symbol, you never have to have anything again to replace it. All you have to do is appreciate and behold it's meaning (don't worry, that will keep us plenty busy for the rest of time). Apply the symbol of everything everywhere in life, for it applies to everything from philosophy to technology. The greatest technology is based on the greatest philosophy. And such a philosophy is not meaningless or redundant. Rather it is predestined by our own wills - a self-fulfilling meaningful prophecy that will lead us back to our origins and connect us back to the universe. It's like you said, once we have the ability to create our own universe, we may find out "who" really created ours.

You keep on thinking and asking questions Graybeard. And if you want, I'll show you a really cool symbol that may strike you as familiar.

sincerely, POK