Lloyd,
Quote:
| And you did originally say fundamental actions of photons, did you not? That would mean absolute fundamental, before first star actions. You can't mix and match, you gotta choose one or the other |
Who said anything about mixing and matching ?
The quote said "
the assumptions of thermodynamics become meaningless" meaning that your use of thermodynamics at such a fundemental level is wrong, as I have said all along.
Quote:
| you offer an interpretation at the finite level of electrodynamic action |
Where have I mentioned anything about electrodynamic action ?
The fundemental actions of photons have nothing to do with heat or light or fluids or charge. They are the fundemental entity on which this Universe owes its existance. At the most fundemental level I don't think that you can even really consider it to really be energy.
Quote:
| The thorough universal decay mechanics can clearly show the thermodynamic necessity |
How can the first action in the Universe be dependant on the decay of something else. It's either first or it isn't and in your case it definitely isn't.
You stated that the first action of your model was as a result of low pressure.
Quote:
What creates the initial low pressure ?
[Lack of high velocity hydrodynamics of the present universe.] |
Again you are relying on something else, or in this case the lack of something else to kick everything off.
Quote:
| Cause, from this point in the universe, is decay of the present hydrodynamic velocity pressure, within the vacuum, and also decay of the vacuum, which would actually equal the ground state initial conditions again, the same as before first present system star |
Your model is so complicated with its low velocities, high velocities, fluid dynamics, thermo dynamics, low pressure, decay mechanics, thermal seas.
The more questions that are raised about your model, you more things you add to it, the latest being this decay you talk about. I'm sure at some point, if you keep adding to it, it will become sentient and be able to post it's auto-biography on this forum.
The differential between NULL and !NULL is no different to how voltage is measured in the macro world.
So
Quote:
| making no logical scientific sense |
It actually does make logical scientific sense, that you don't understand it doesn't make it any less valid.
If any of the multitude of different dynamic systems you are relying on can be broken down or reduced in any way to their components, then they are too complex and have no place in a model of how the Universe functions ATTHE MOST FUNDEMENTAL LEVEL.
The fact that they may be valid at a higher level is not an issue here.
PB.