| Re: The Simplest TOE
Posted by LG
You see Steven, as bad as you want your model to be the final theory, you must still answer "The Prime Mover" question, for your model to have any true scientific validity. Don't feel bad, this is where everyone has failed, yet when I have offered many a prime mover solution, all have rejected it. All reasons of rejection have been based on false interpretations of the three laws of thermodynamics, Newton's laws of forces, and Boltzman's laws of gasses___the true combinations of. Yet, I haven't seen anyone who understands these three systems well enough, to see the simplicity of what I have been trying to offer, for well over a year, now. Unless we can resolve this prime mover issue, I don't think it possible to create a valid theory of the universe. I am all ears, if you have another prime mover idea, other than what I have offered. So, please explain the mechanics of the prime mover, in your model, if you have one, as I don't see one, yet... IMO, nothing moves without a scientific mechanical prime mover... Lloyd
LG, what would we gain by knowing what the PRIME MOVER is ? Would it benefit humanity ? Would it end humanities suffering ? Would it uncover the T.O.E. ?
Would the "PRIME MOVER" be the Absolute Fundamental Substance per se and the Prime Mover of fundamental substance or matter i.e. stopped light as matter ?
Do you really want to know what the Absolute Prime Mover IS ?
If i can show you how to prove to your self what the Absolute Prime Mover "IS" will you test it to determine its true or false status as the Prime Mover ?  |