A successful theory of everything should be able to make predictions of physical effects. This one does.
In the late seventies and early eighties I developed an interest in particle physics, astrophysics, and supernovae. Out of that interest I saw that there was match between the characteristics of a graviton, the theorized carrier of the gravitational interaction and the neutral current Z boson as a neutrino/antineutrino pair. So, I wrote up a paper and submitted it to The Gravity Research Foundation in Wellesley, Mass. for their annual competition. My attorney copyrighted it in the event it was promising.
It predicts that a change in the ambient neutrino flux gradient will be accompanied by a transient and corresponding change in the local gravitational field gradient. When supernova 1987a went off and the prompt neutrino burst was detected at the Mont Blanc, IMB, Kamiokande, Baksan neutrino detectors, and simultaneously at the Rome and Maryland bar gravitational wave detectors, that prediction was fulfilled. This has been published about 25 times since then in various journals including the Astrophysical Journal, Il Nuovo Cimento C, etc. Larry Sulak, principlal investigator of the IMB, whom I personally know from the MIT Winter Course on Nuclear and Particle Physics,91-92, claims the chance of those coincidences being wrong is statistically 1/10,000. You can view the details at
www.bautforum where I post as Trinitree88.
There is no dark matter here, no dark energy, no violation of conservation laws, no new particle, not even a change in the Standard Model. The Z couples universally to all the particles in the Satandard Model, and the neutrino/antineutrino pair was suggested by Nobel Laureate George Gamow in the 60's as a candidate for a graviton. I simply put the pieces together and looked for, and predicted the subsequent effect. Sincerely, Pete.