Quote:
Originally Posted by Lloyd Gillespie  Totally unproven theoretical math, though it may be quite accurate...
Lloyd |
The instruments can make precise enough measurements. The experiment data are good fit to match the expectation of theoretical physics. (Occasionally, those irregular data had been depleted or taken as noise.) So, those data can pass peer reviews.
The point is, will those key interpretations of equations of Big Bang really what the universe are practising. The whole Big Bang depends upon the validity of 2 pillars: 1) spacetime rather than space-and-time; and 2) Dopper Effect is caused by cosmic/spacetime expansion, not by any other reasons. In case one of these 2 pillars are invalid, the whole Big Bang Theory becomes invalid.
Rigor math/equational derivations have one trouble -- once the presumed premise is wrong, elegant prototype and its inductions become a weirdness.
Best Regards. Bottomlander