[Lloyd Gillespie]

Hi BL, good points...

Originally Posted by bottomlander The instruments can make precise enough measurements. The experiment data are good fit to match the expectation of theoretical physics. (Occasionally, those irregular data had been depleted or taken as noise.) So, those data can pass peer reviews. [Yes, but the entire physics and math communities can not totally agree on the ground position of measure. Where is the ground measure, to be placed? I do accept the standard measures of things, but many do not, and yet I absolutely know there is no universal constant, except change. "Changes, changes, changes, these things too, shall pass away." I-Ching. Yet, I only accept eternal permanent change.] The point is, will those key interpretations of equations of Big Bang really what the universe are practising. The whole Big Bang depends upon the validity of 2 pillars: 1) spacetime rather than space-and-time; and 2) Dopper Effect is caused by cosmic/spacetime expansion, not by any other reasons. In case one of these 2 pillars are invalid, the whole Big Bang Theory becomes invalid. [I think if you truly re-read all of Einstein, you may realize his ideas do not relie on a strict interpretation of spacetime, that is the false interpretations of others. Newton's space was and is always considered almost accurate by Einstein and most physicists. Poincare's time was and is considered accurate by Einstein and most physicists. Lorentz's doppler mechanics was and is considered accurate by Einstein and most physicists. The two pillars are just often confused fundamentals. The big bang still has to be valid in one form or another, either the one bang or the many bangs, yet one would have most likely occured first, as one or the other first star mechanics is absolutely required by any model universe, as the stars are empirically___Here.] Rigor math/equational derivations have one trouble -- once the presumed premise is wrong, elegant prototype and its inductions become a weirdness. [All math can be total abstraction, just add the real substance mechanics to the math, and all becomes clear.] Best Regards. Bottomlander

Hope this helps,
Lloyd