[Fredrick]

Thank you both for your replies. Of course, I am happier with Nobody's reply than yours, Lloyd, but each person has the right to differ or decide to not look.

I will deliver a last example, and end that with a request to both of you (and others) to use the model for correctly placing the information you already know.

1 — The model has three oppositional pairs, and in the pyramid of "primary colors" the pair of white vs. all primary colors is easy to spot. In the top, where all colors come together, we find white, while at the four corners of the pyramid we find red, blue, yellow, and green. As you notice, there should only be three primary colors, but the color set actually comes in two different versions: when using paint, the three colors are red, blue, and yellow; when using light (as in a television tube) the three colors are red, blue and green.

2 — The differing pair that shows transformation is therefore yellow and green, since it is either yellow or green that is used as a primary color. One is when light is reflected, the other when it is light itself. You will recognize the similarity with young-old, the other transformational pair I used in an earlier post. This differing pair includes the situation in the middle of being both young & old (or said differently of being neither young nor old). For yellow and green this is the transformation of yellow to gray/muted — from reflected light to no light (and thus no reflection either) — and then on from gray/muted to green — from no light to just light (but no reflection).

3 — The other oppositional pair is red and blue. Instead of seeing them as each others opposite, they are here just the two outcomes that remain unchangeable. Within themselves, they are well-grounded, like the Northpole being the ultimate pole of North and the Southpole being the ultimate South. Same is true for the male-female pair, each one of them ultimately being the grounded delivery of their gender. Despite that grounded nature, we are of course much more than just our gender, and genetically we are overwhelmingly similar (though we often focus on what is not similar). Yet in gender, human beings are each other's opposite.

In the pyramid of color, red and blue are the only two colors that can deliver two other easily recognizable colors when mixing them: purple and brown. When mixing two primary colors no other set delivers two very distinguishable colors — they only deliver one.

The outside of the pyramid is where we find black, that 'color' of no reflection and no light. The brightest contrast is naturally found in top, with black sitting right next to white. While black is not part of the pyramid itself, it does have a surprising place inside it as well. When the primary colors are mixed we get white in the top, but lower on the pyramid the white is toned down, muted — the central core of the pyramid gets grayer and grayer towards the base. If we were to peel away all that what shows color in this pyramid, and only leave the gray in place, the cone becomes visible. The gray part within the pyramid — what can also be seen as the combination of black and white — is the cone, already described to have various important mathematical deliveries: the circle, the ellipse, the parabole and hyperbole. The cone is where we find the results as delivered through cooperation (mixing of colors).

--------------------

So, Lloyd and Nobody. I would like to ask you to use this model of the three oppositional pairs. If you don't mind, Lloyd, will you please try your hand on placing the four forces in this model. And would you use it to display your DNA information, Nobody. As you will notice, some of the information/knowledge you have will be too specific to be placed in the model, but I am hoping you will experience the surprise when having to use these three oppositional pairs: general-specific, the ultimate/unchangeable pair, and the changeable/transformational pair. Only if you experience the surprise of placing the specific forces or building blocks in place, do I believe you will find the correctness of this fascinating overall delivery. Yet you will then also see that it is a modest model — no TOE will ever predict the exact number of sand grains on the beach on Wednesday, three o'clock; that is not how a TOE works.

The first pair in the case of the four forces would of course be the generic term 'force' vs. the specific forces, and in the case of DNA it would be the 'genetic building block' vs. the building blocks in specific.

I hope you allow me this honor, guys. One last clue, the correct view of a pyramid never shows four corners at the same time. Only when standing at the top of a pyramid can one see all four corners, but that specific high-up location should be considered as far removed from the ground. When we see a pyramid in the distance, the maximum number of corners we can see is only three. By walking around, we can remain grounded at all time, yet take in the overall information too.

Please, if others want to try their hand on this model, go ahead.