[N0B0DY]

Ok, Fredrick, but realize that if the model we submit doesn't fit we must quit it.

Contextually (sort of an important factor), it doesn't fit and here's why:

The top position is not absolutely unified, but can become infinitely more unified the more the colors merge - the absolute point of white is not whitest, but non-existent (not black either); the base of the model is based on separation, and increases infinitely the more the colors are separated from each other, the absolute darkest hue of any color is not black, but non-existent; the absolute singularity, whether it be a singular unification of influencing colors or a singular color at maximum entropy, doesn't exist based on the probablistic boundary of the Uncertainty Principle.

Even if we include Lloyd's diamond, or consider the central point of the base, darker and darker shades of gray toward black...never absolutely black.

It's sort of like the Yin/Yang, TaiChi Symbol, containing if even infinitesimal amounts of each opposite, never absolutely white or black; and then there is no symbol at all, known as WuChi - non-existence. It has been suggested that if we absorbed and detected all photons through our retinae, black would turn to white and white would turn to black because there is no differentiation. You know, "blinded by the light."

I tried to use the, perhaps similar, white canvass containing all pictures until there is differentiation, to separate the various hues by which reality is ascertained, without which there is no such thing as existence - neither awareness of the light show, nor the awareness of the lack of it.

The subconscious, which governs "reality," is based on the probablistic persistence of existence in a form that can exist circumstantially according to myriad factors originating in an abstract subatomic functioning. Abstract, because all scales are resolved at points that don't exist "now."

Again, the "fundamental" workings are slowed considerably, comparable to the spectrum being a designated portion of an infinite spectrum; consciousness being comparable to the visible spectrum; and the absolute - of which there is no time - where anything is circumstantially possible. Possible only through fluctuations of the two perspectives of non-existence - namely, "one" and "none" containing an infinite number of abstractfractions that the subconscious feeds the conscious to make "real" the unreal.

Lloyd,

Direct question: what would happen to your absolute mass if it was torn apart at greater than the speed of light?

Like you said, the link is old news. Yet, direct question two: consider if a hydrogen atom consisted of 900 or so electrons and 900 or so positrons - a.k.a., a neutron, in what way could we possibly/probably extract an electron to give us a proton and electron?