Quote:
Originally Posted by N0B0DY  Lloyd,
Direct question: what would happen to your absolute mass if it was torn apart at greater than the speed of light? [I have already posted in this thread and many others, that any mass, even being a 10# football of diamond/germanium, tungston, and titanium, would reach its terminal critical mass entropy velocity, and begin radiating away all its substance structure, except its fundamental photonic substance, which is all that would reach true c, and have what standard physics refers to as zero mass, but I doubt this figure, as mass and energy are supposed to be equivalent, Einstein's equivalence principle, but I see the energy exists, yet physics says photons are zero mass. It's a problem with physics, not I. In the end, the absolute fundamental photonic substance, still exists, as true matter mass/energy/motion. Somebody better re-do the physics books.]
Like you said, the link is old news. Yet, direct question two: consider if a hydrogen atom consisted of 900 or so electrons and 900 or so positrons - a.k.a., a neutron, in what way could we possibly/probably extract an electron to give us a proton and electron? |
We extract such atomic structures with catalytic propertied minerals and metals, by passing atomic/molecular structures through such specialty made converters, as the materials require. Neutron bombs also do this. Certain photo-voltaic cells also accomplish the same, or similar acts. Certain fuel cell technologies are also already doing similar work___Check out Ballard Power, in B.C., Canada___They do work for NASA. New work in these areas looks most promising, expecially new advances in nano-energy-technology. The more complex issue would be how to create electrons and protons from natural photon light. Nature does it, so there's really no reason why we can't, with the proper experiences and experiments. Still, as I've said many places before, no matter what great scientific device mankind creates, the greedy power brokers will turn it quickly into another facet of the economic greed machine, so technology's only true answers, lie in economically computerizing, with time-scal
er changing laws, their greed, out of the system.
Nobody, the reason I keep insisting on using absolute, is the world has far too long been plagued by relative abstractions, that much foolish physics has wandered off into. I don't know if you realize it or not, but this bad process has filtered out into every cross-disciplinary field, with devastating results, to the evolution of sensible knowledge advancements. Believe me, I've attended many of the other fields' seminars and meetings. No-one can make any headway with all the gridlock presented by relativity and abstraction, or
pure religion, as I call it. It is the real problem, of solving any of the world's real problems___period. So, I say, "Welcome back, Mr. Absolute." And believe me, I'm not the only one going down this road. If you do a search of "relative", and "absolute", on Google, you'll find them about matched, last I checked around 15 to 16 million hits each... I just checked again, and these two words are running two to one for relative, but for "absolute truth" and "relative truth", it's considerably in favor of "absolute truth", anyway, the debate is a hotly contested area of inquiry...
Lloyd
p.s.
"The world is a gambling casino,
Designed and sanctioned by "god".
Money is the mind of the spirit.
The bankers are the dealers,
And, we are the hands,
Playing the cards, of greed!" me