[N0B0DY]

I'm pretty sure we've been through the big idea many many times, and will repeat the same stupid history even after the sun fries the earth. It's a sick twist buried in every mind, which I have proven to myself in a particular perspective-to-perception way.

From the beginning of this thread, I've tried to portray the means by which the forces are negated as a whole. For sure, Lloyd, I can understand your frustrating predicament when trying to explain that "man's got to know his boundaries. Yet since time immemorial man has taken for granted what is beyond the observable and theoretical.

I know also that the wild world of quantum mechanics gets to you as well, but like Witten has said, "It can be tamed." I'm sure you've come across the notion of gravity escaping into another universe to account for its feebleness, and there can be a clear picture of how we can apply this to both microscopic and macroscopic gravity when we go beyond Planck - the "meeting point" of multiple universes being any point beyond Planck.

In effect, the stronger forward-time electromagnetic universe consists solely of the effects gravity (the force beyond Planck) has on the photons you perceive as real. The "point of impact" of your ramjets produce in waves subplanck where gravity escapes into another universe's forward time. The strong force, being the inverse of gravity, confines particles when gravity overcomes electromagnetism; the weak force, the inverse of electromagnetism, creates protons when electromagnetism overcomes gravity. Essentially all the forces are a result of the repellent and attractive effects of electromagnetism functioning in both directions of time. The omniverse, if you will, remains constant at absolute 0 based on the Certainty Principle that states that all forces have equal counter forces negating all to 0.

Another problem I see is in equating absolute solidity and absolute vacuity, rendering both states motionless and hence non-existent, when we invoke spatial infinity as being the fundamental substance of which motion creates crashing waves. I would say, no, the waves aren't moving until symmetry is broken and the wave function collapses at a predetermined probablistic measurement. In reality, the energy density remains constant at 0, and observable waves are the result of gravitational time dilation in the form of weak and electromagnetic decay.

If everything happens in no time, empirical and theoretical science seems to be accounting for phenomena way behind the times.