Theory of Everything - View Single Post - Einstein's so-called 'Biggest Blunder' was right after all.

RascalPuff

Past Is Prologue
('Who'll stop the rain?)

Page 4 of 5 - 9/20/06
Subcultures/Psuedoscience SciForums.com

Is Yesterday Really Gone? Lost & Found in Space.

“
Originally Posted by Stryder
I'm not sure if this has been stated to you or not, however I'm guessing that most of the information you've posted here has come from another source.

The forums attempts in a causal way to keep certain rules, one of them is copying texts from anywhere on the internet and posting them.

What is usually suggested is to either house a file with the text in on your own webspace or link to the original text. It's also suggested that a brief paragraph "Teaser" from the text is quoted, with your own comments to make discussion.
”

Dear Stryder:

The other source this information came from is my own published post (Not a blog),Total Field Theory (Survey Notes Pt. II) at http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie.
I hope this is acceptable to you.
I have linked to the entire website several times and been crticized for 'spamming', whereas the website is an entire book, with nothing 'for sale'.

Thank you for your consideration.
_________________

Phlogistician (3,008 posts) Moderator

Seems I share my disdain for your prose with others, Dorkon;

"The original poster is another prime example of someone who thinks they've rewritten physics, but all I see is words, no maths." (http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?act=ST&f=16&t=6451)

Others have put my other thoughts about you quite succinctly too;

http://killdevilhill.com/astronomy/r...33&i=352&t=129

You've spammed forum after forum, yet nobody takes you seriously, nor have you caused a paradigm shift in physics. I suggest you give up, and try to do something fruitful.
______________________

Kaiduorkhon - RascalPuff (Registered Senior 206 Posts)
“
Originally Posted by phlogistician
Seems I share my disdain for your prose with others, Dorkon;

"The original poster is another prime example of someone who thinks they've rewritten physics, but all I see is words, no maths." (http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?act=ST&f=16&t=6451)

Others have put my other thoughts about you quite succinctly too;

http://killdevilhill.com/astronomy/r...33&i=352&t=129

You've spammed forum after forum, yet nobody takes you seriously, nor have you caused a paradigm shift in physics. I suggest you give up, and try to do something fruitful. ”
_______________________________

'Rewritten physics?'. Hardly. One doesn't jack the universe up and place a new one under it. The math is already done. You find everything right where it is, while re-recognizing it. Google and other net crawling chronology confirms that the statements 'Gravity, electricity & magnetism are the 4th, 5th and 6th dimensions (with all of it's unprecedented contingent recognitions)' were not anywhere on the net until posted by a volunteer - Bkparque (Brian Kirk Parquette) - in December '99, in the condensed 9th edition of a hard copy essay and book, originally published in Naples, Italy and New Jersey in 1959. It's sold out all over the country (and in Europe, in three languages) in small press, ever since.
It has yet to be disqualified, though, since it was posted on the net in '99, Parquette, Caleb, McCutcheon and Mathis have variously replicated key portions of it without so much as the mention of my name - it's all over the net and vigorously paralleled in the first two chapters of Mike McCutcheon's Final Theory .

Paradigm shift? Your name calling, unfounded, envy motivated antithetical attack is an example of those who would and do vacantly deny it. Although McCutcheon uses it in the early chapters of his book he stumbles and lurches off on his own to avoid a conspicuous blazing of a remarkably wide, clear, unprecedented ground breaking trail that's already established (for decades) by Truly Yours.

The best observation McCutcheon pens was published by him several years after it was posted on the net by B.K.Parquette - 12/'99; originated with my work, originally titled, An Hypothesis on Gravity (in '59 - following through on Einstein's General Principle and the elevator analogy as it had never been followed through before).

The title then evolved to 'The New Gravity', then 'Gravity is the 4th Dimension', and more recently, 'Total Unified Field Theory'. at http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie, since it's being presented to and given free to the public your spamming allegation is empty.

Dr. Richard Feynman couldn't disqualify it when he (very cordially) skipped three classes to argue it with me in his office at UCLA, in October of '66; he notably introduced very little math and complimented and encouraged me in my work; which does quote from many authoritative sources in order to connectively authenticate the unprecedented findings and narration.

You seem to think that a conspicuous following is necessary in order for a work to be tenable, when history shows many opposite trends, just as it is unfolding now, though the 'shift in paradigm' is in fact measurably underway, right here on the internet - those who are participating in this shift are deliberately or inadvertantly excluding knowledge of or accredation to this author. The more controversial this belatedly celebrated work becomes under any name, the closer my unfilchable work rises to world class surface. As for efforts to purloin it from Truly Yours, I wish all such navigators a journey that takes them not to deliver the issued work and the recognition for who originated it, to my front door, where it's always been and always will be. You may as well steal the Rock of Gibralter (bring your friends, guns, money, lawyers, politicians, David Copperfield <and his friends> and the Hollywood Guild...)

And you would have me abandon it in the middle of it's much belated emergence on the Gutenburg rallied internet. Why don't you and your 'disdainfully sharing' followers, and all those like you, simply read - instead of squawking about - the condensation at the provided URL and disqualify it as it has yet to be nullified - why not just do it - disqualify it - instead of covetously heaving and sighing with vainly impotent frustration and aspersion hurling anger?
______________________________

2inquisitive (2,398 Posts)
Kaidourkhon,
“
The title then evolved to 'The New Gravity', then 'Gravity is the 4th Dimension', and more recently, 'Total Unified Field Theory'. at http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie, since it's being presented to and given free to the public your spamming allegation is empty. ”

I visited the website, but found no theory, only a discussion forum. Perhaps you have a link to the theory itself?
“
Kaidourkhon,
Einstein was persuaded to abandon the Cosmological Constant, with which he predicted an expanding - not a big bang - universe: eight years before it was discovered. ”

Not exactly. The equations of General Relativity lead to an unstable universe, one that would either contract or expand. Einstein added his Cosmological Constant to stabilize the universe. It could be either a repulsive force to counteract a collapsing universe, or an attractive force to stabilize an expanding universe. Einstein did not predict an expanding universe, but instead used the Cosmological Constant to predict a stable universe.

Kaidourkhon,
“
Please keep in mind that J.C. Maxwell had yet to discover and mathematically describe electromagnetic fields generated by mass and projecting through space (gravity was once thought to act at a distance instantaneously, when in fact it - non-coincidentally - is found to propogate at exactly the same speed as light, since that's what it is). ”

According to General Relativity, gravitational waves are predicted to travel at the speed of light. Does a gravitational field travel at all? Where is a reference to the back the statement that gravity is found to propogate at exactly the same speed as light? Information travels at exactly 'c'. Let me ask a question, please. The Shapiro effect has been verified. Electromagnetic radiation has been measured to propogate more slowly when passing through a gravitation field. The light takes longer to arrive when it passes near massive objects or their gravitational fields. General Relativity predicts this is because light travels a longer path around mass, a curvature of spacetime caused by the gravitational field of the mass. Does your 'gravity' that travels 'exactly' the speed of light take longer to propogate through gravitational fields? In other words, does gravity follow the curvature of spacetime like light? If it does, how can it escape past the event horizon of a black hole?
________________________________

Stryder, Moderator (5,208 Posts)
“
Originally Posted by 2inquisitive
Does a gravitational field travel at all? ”

Consider this, a Particle Travels, a Wave is a Transversal method, where as a Field surrounds a point that emits it. Therefore a "Gravitational field" doesn't travel.
____________________________________________

“
Originally Posted by 2inquisitive
Kaidourkhon,

I visited the website, but found no theory, only a discussion forum. Perhaps you have a link to the theory itself?

Not exactly. The equations of General Relativity lead to an unstable universe, one that would either contract or expand. Einstein added his Cosmological Constant to stabilize the universe. It could be either a repulsive force to counteract a collapsing universe, or an attractive force to stabilize an expanding universe. Einstein did not predict an expanding universe, but instead used the Cosmological Constant to predict a stable universe.

Kaidourkhon,

According to General Relativity, gravitational waves are predicted to travel at the speed of light. Does a gravitational field travel at all? Where is a reference to the back the statement that gravity is found to propogate at exactly the same speed as light? Information travels at exactly 'c'. Let me ask a question, please. The Shapiro effect has been verified. Electromagnetic radiation has been measured to propogate more slowly when passing through a gravitation field. The light takes longer to arrive when it passes near massive objects or their gravitational fields. General Relativity predicts this is because light travels a longer path around mass, a curvature of spacetime caused by the gravitational field of the mass. Does your 'gravity' that travels 'exactly' the speed of light take longer to propogate through gravitational fields? In other words, does gravity follow the curvature of spacetime like light? If it does, how can it escape past the event horizon of a black hole? ”

___________________________

1. Kaidourkhon,
“ The title then evolved to 'The New Gravity', then 'Gravity is the 4th Dimension', and more recently, 'Total Unified Field Theory'. at http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie, since it's being presented to and given free to the public your spamming allegation is empty. ”

I visited the website, but found no theory, only a discussion forum. Perhaps you have a link to the theory itself?

Dear 2 inquisitive:
I’ve been calling forums websites since 2002 when I first starting using computers on line. You’re right, it is a forum, but take note that there is no reciprocal discussion there (at least not yet). Rather, it is a monologue and narrative forum format, featureing a series of quotes that are related to one another; reaching unprecedented conclusions.

“Kaidourkhon,
Einstein was persuaded to abandon the Cosmological Constant, with which he predicted an expanding - not a big bang - universe: eight years before it was discovered.”

Not exactly. The equations of General Relativity lead to an unstable universe, one that would either contract or expand. Einstein added his Cosmological Constant to stabilize the universe. It could be either a repulsive force to counteract a collapsing universe, or an attractive force to stabilize an expanding universe. Einstein did not predict an expanding universe, but instead used the Cosmological Constant to predict a stable universe.

Dear 2inquisitive:
You probably know that Friedmann found that Einstein’s Cosmological Constant ‘might start expanding or contracting at the siightest provacation’. Well. I submit that E’s C (repelling force) C is in fact expanding - causing the observed, spatially expanding universe (w’out a big bang); most resembling a Steady State universe.

Kaidourkhon,
“Please keep in mind that J.C. Maxwell had yet to discover and mathematically describe electromagnetic fields generated by mass and projecting through space (gravity was once thought to act at a distance instantaneously, when in fact it - non-coincidentally - is found to propogate at exactly the same speed as light, since that's what it is). ”

According to General Relativity, gravitational waves are predicted to travel at the speed of light. Does a gravitational field travel at all? Where is a reference to the back the statement that gravity is found to propogate at exactly the same speed as light? Information travels at exactly 'c'

To be continued.

	(#3 (permalink))
RascalPuff Aka the White Mongol Status: Offline Posts: 1,449 Thanks Given: 89 Thanked 81x in 77 Posts Join Date: Apr 2007 Rep Power: 21 Awards Showcase Total Awards: 1	Re: Einstein's so-called 'Biggest Blunder' was right after all. - 04-24-2007, 04:21 AM Past Is Prologue ('Who'll stop the rain?) Page 4 of 5 - 9/20/06 Subcultures/Psuedoscience SciForums.com Is Yesterday Really Gone? Lost & Found in Space. “ Originally Posted by Stryder I'm not sure if this has been stated to you or not, however I'm guessing that most of the information you've posted here has come from another source. The forums attempts in a causal way to keep certain rules, one of them is copying texts from anywhere on the internet and posting them. What is usually suggested is to either house a file with the text in on your own webspace or link to the original text. It's also suggested that a brief paragraph "Teaser" from the text is quoted, with your own comments to make discussion. ” Dear Stryder: The other source this information came from is my own published post (Not a blog),Total Field Theory (Survey Notes Pt. II) at http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie. I hope this is acceptable to you. I have linked to the entire website several times and been crticized for 'spamming', whereas the website is an entire book, with nothing 'for sale'. Thank you for your consideration. _________________ Phlogistician (3,008 posts) Moderator Seems I share my disdain for your prose with others, Dorkon; "The original poster is another prime example of someone who thinks they've rewritten physics, but all I see is words, no maths." (http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?act=ST&f=16&t=6451) Others have put my other thoughts about you quite succinctly too; http://killdevilhill.com/astronomy/r...33&i=352&t=129 You've spammed forum after forum, yet nobody takes you seriously, nor have you caused a paradigm shift in physics. I suggest you give up, and try to do something fruitful. ______________________ Kaiduorkhon - RascalPuff (Registered Senior 206 Posts) “ Originally Posted by phlogistician Seems I share my disdain for your prose with others, Dorkon; "The original poster is another prime example of someone who thinks they've rewritten physics, but all I see is words, no maths." (http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?act=ST&f=16&t=6451) Others have put my other thoughts about you quite succinctly too; http://killdevilhill.com/astronomy/r...33&i=352&t=129 You've spammed forum after forum, yet nobody takes you seriously, nor have you caused a paradigm shift in physics. I suggest you give up, and try to do something fruitful. ” _______________________________ 'Rewritten physics?'. Hardly. One doesn't jack the universe up and place a new one under it. The math is already done. You find everything right where it is, while re-recognizing it. Google and other net crawling chronology confirms that the statements 'Gravity, electricity & magnetism are the 4th, 5th and 6th dimensions (with all of it's unprecedented contingent recognitions)' were not anywhere on the net until posted by a volunteer - Bkparque (Brian Kirk Parquette) - in December '99, in the condensed 9th edition of a hard copy essay and book, originally published in Naples, Italy and New Jersey in 1959. It's sold out all over the country (and in Europe, in three languages) in small press, ever since. It has yet to be disqualified, though, since it was posted on the net in '99, Parquette, Caleb, McCutcheon and Mathis have variously replicated key portions of it without so much as the mention of my name - it's all over the net and vigorously paralleled in the first two chapters of Mike McCutcheon's Final Theory . Paradigm shift? Your name calling, unfounded, envy motivated antithetical attack is an example of those who would and do vacantly deny it. Although McCutcheon uses it in the early chapters of his book he stumbles and lurches off on his own to avoid a conspicuous blazing of a remarkably wide, clear, unprecedented ground breaking trail that's already established (for decades) by Truly Yours. The best observation McCutcheon pens was published by him several years after it was posted on the net by B.K.Parquette - 12/'99; originated with my work, originally titled, An Hypothesis on Gravity (in '59 - following through on Einstein's General Principle and the elevator analogy as it had never been followed through before). The title then evolved to 'The New Gravity', then 'Gravity is the 4th Dimension', and more recently, 'Total Unified Field Theory'. at http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie, since it's being presented to and given free to the public your spamming allegation is empty. Dr. Richard Feynman couldn't disqualify it when he (very cordially) skipped three classes to argue it with me in his office at UCLA, in October of '66; he notably introduced very little math and complimented and encouraged me in my work; which does quote from many authoritative sources in order to connectively authenticate the unprecedented findings and narration. You seem to think that a conspicuous following is necessary in order for a work to be tenable, when history shows many opposite trends, just as it is unfolding now, though the 'shift in paradigm' is in fact measurably underway, right here on the internet - those who are participating in this shift are deliberately or inadvertantly excluding knowledge of or accredation to this author. The more controversial this belatedly celebrated work becomes under any name, the closer my unfilchable work rises to world class surface. As for efforts to purloin it from Truly Yours, I wish all such navigators a journey that takes them not to deliver the issued work and the recognition for who originated it, to my front door, where it's always been and always will be. You may as well steal the Rock of Gibralter (bring your friends, guns, money, lawyers, politicians, David Copperfield <and his friends> and the Hollywood Guild...) And you would have me abandon it in the middle of it's much belated emergence on the Gutenburg rallied internet. Why don't you and your 'disdainfully sharing' followers, and all those like you, simply read - instead of squawking about - the condensation at the provided URL and disqualify it as it has yet to be nullified - why not just do it - disqualify it - instead of covetously heaving and sighing with vainly impotent frustration and aspersion hurling anger? ______________________________ 2inquisitive (2,398 Posts) Kaidourkhon, “ The title then evolved to 'The New Gravity', then 'Gravity is the 4th Dimension', and more recently, 'Total Unified Field Theory'. at http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie, since it's being presented to and given free to the public your spamming allegation is empty. ” I visited the website, but found no theory, only a discussion forum. Perhaps you have a link to the theory itself? “ Kaidourkhon, Einstein was persuaded to abandon the Cosmological Constant, with which he predicted an expanding - not a big bang - universe: eight years before it was discovered. ” Not exactly. The equations of General Relativity lead to an unstable universe, one that would either contract or expand. Einstein added his Cosmological Constant to stabilize the universe. It could be either a repulsive force to counteract a collapsing universe, or an attractive force to stabilize an expanding universe. Einstein did not predict an expanding universe, but instead used the Cosmological Constant to predict a stable universe. Kaidourkhon, “ Please keep in mind that J.C. Maxwell had yet to discover and mathematically describe electromagnetic fields generated by mass and projecting through space (gravity was once thought to act at a distance instantaneously, when in fact it - non-coincidentally - is found to propogate at exactly the same speed as light, since that's what it is). ” According to General Relativity, gravitational waves are predicted to travel at the speed of light. Does a gravitational field travel at all? Where is a reference to the back the statement that gravity is found to propogate at exactly the same speed as light? Information travels at exactly 'c'. Let me ask a question, please. The Shapiro effect has been verified. Electromagnetic radiation has been measured to propogate more slowly when passing through a gravitation field. The light takes longer to arrive when it passes near massive objects or their gravitational fields. General Relativity predicts this is because light travels a longer path around mass, a curvature of spacetime caused by the gravitational field of the mass. Does your 'gravity' that travels 'exactly' the speed of light take longer to propogate through gravitational fields? In other words, does gravity follow the curvature of spacetime like light? If it does, how can it escape past the event horizon of a black hole? ________________________________ Stryder, Moderator (5,208 Posts) “ Originally Posted by 2inquisitive Does a gravitational field travel at all? ” Consider this, a Particle Travels, a Wave is a Transversal method, where as a Field surrounds a point that emits it. Therefore a "Gravitational field" doesn't travel. ____________________________________________ “ Originally Posted by 2inquisitive Kaidourkhon, I visited the website, but found no theory, only a discussion forum. Perhaps you have a link to the theory itself? Not exactly. The equations of General Relativity lead to an unstable universe, one that would either contract or expand. Einstein added his Cosmological Constant to stabilize the universe. It could be either a repulsive force to counteract a collapsing universe, or an attractive force to stabilize an expanding universe. Einstein did not predict an expanding universe, but instead used the Cosmological Constant to predict a stable universe. Kaidourkhon, According to General Relativity, gravitational waves are predicted to travel at the speed of light. Does a gravitational field travel at all? Where is a reference to the back the statement that gravity is found to propogate at exactly the same speed as light? Information travels at exactly 'c'. Let me ask a question, please. The Shapiro effect has been verified. Electromagnetic radiation has been measured to propogate more slowly when passing through a gravitation field. The light takes longer to arrive when it passes near massive objects or their gravitational fields. General Relativity predicts this is because light travels a longer path around mass, a curvature of spacetime caused by the gravitational field of the mass. Does your 'gravity' that travels 'exactly' the speed of light take longer to propogate through gravitational fields? In other words, does gravity follow the curvature of spacetime like light? If it does, how can it escape past the event horizon of a black hole? ” ___________________________ 1. Kaidourkhon, “ The title then evolved to 'The New Gravity', then 'Gravity is the 4th Dimension', and more recently, 'Total Unified Field Theory'. at http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie, since it's being presented to and given free to the public your spamming allegation is empty. ” I visited the website, but found no theory, only a discussion forum. Perhaps you have a link to the theory itself? Dear 2 inquisitive: I’ve been calling forums websites since 2002 when I first starting using computers on line. You’re right, it is a forum, but take note that there is no reciprocal discussion there (at least not yet). Rather, it is a monologue and narrative forum format, featureing a series of quotes that are related to one another; reaching unprecedented conclusions. “Kaidourkhon, Einstein was persuaded to abandon the Cosmological Constant, with which he predicted an expanding - not a big bang - universe: eight years before it was discovered.” Not exactly. The equations of General Relativity lead to an unstable universe, one that would either contract or expand. Einstein added his Cosmological Constant to stabilize the universe. It could be either a repulsive force to counteract a collapsing universe, or an attractive force to stabilize an expanding universe. Einstein did not predict an expanding universe, but instead used the Cosmological Constant to predict a stable universe. Dear 2inquisitive: You probably know that Friedmann found that Einstein’s Cosmological Constant ‘might start expanding or contracting at the siightest provacation’. Well. I submit that E’s C (repelling force) C is in fact expanding - causing the observed, spatially expanding universe (w’out a big bang); most resembling a Steady State universe. Kaidourkhon, “Please keep in mind that J.C. Maxwell had yet to discover and mathematically describe electromagnetic fields generated by mass and projecting through space (gravity was once thought to act at a distance instantaneously, when in fact it - non-coincidentally - is found to propogate at exactly the same speed as light, since that's what it is). ” According to General Relativity, gravitational waves are predicted to travel at the speed of light. Does a gravitational field travel at all? Where is a reference to the back the statement that gravity is found to propogate at exactly the same speed as light? Information travels at exactly 'c' To be continued.