Quote:
The 4-D space-time continuum is presently said to be 'acknowledged' in academic and experimental physics; yet, the effects of that continuum, continue to go unrecognized, denied, discarded and unaccounted for. The round - O and elliptical - 0 - 3-D structure - wherever it orbitally occurs - is not anticipated or perceived as spiral shaped - @ , as it is in fact, in the prevailing, four dimensional setting.
There is no precedent for this offered (4-D spiral 'translatory moment') explanation, regarding the cited 'incomprehensibility' of Quantum Mechanical Dynamics; including a solution applicable to the 'quantum leap' - in this case, the transition ('translatory moment') from ominidirectionally accelerating (4-D) solid matter to further - omnidirectionally - accelerated (5-D) light energy. |
This is what I wrote about the same idea, but there's no four body math to prove either of our models; "This is the point where I see almost all quantumists' and relativists' ideas break down. What I mean is, trying to use quantum/relative logic to understand sub-quantum actions___I say it can't be done. The sub-quantum, or more appropriately, pre-quantum universe, requires its own special language of description. As an example, you talk of sub-quantum photons, or entities that make up photons and actions; Dave talks about sub-quantum substance of space and motion; and I often talk of sub-quantum hydrodynamic motion and substance. The way I see it, all these subjects require an entirely new sub-quantum linguistics and maths to accurately describe any of these events. Yes, it is true we can apply many of the quantum and relative world's maths and actions, to this sub-quantum universe, we can not, at the same time, assume its total correspondences, i.e., such as that of the velocity of light, or the true values of mass. We only can know such velocity of light as being of the quantum/relative universe, since the big-bang, inflation, first star, or however you want it. We can not know the speed of light to be an eternal wave motion, and herein lies the problem of trying to associate quantum ideas with sub-quantum ideas. We must first take a closer look at a possible pre-quantum, sub-quantum reality of slower, much slower motions___first and foremost. There is no law in the universe, that says light had to travel C or faster, for eternity. As a matter of fact, it most likely travels slower, and faster, in many areas of the universe, than in our local area of the aether. This would explain much of quantum/relative cosmology's problems of observations and facts, since such facts would make it truly impossible for observers to tell whether the universe is expanding or contracting, or whether certain parts are doing both___conspansion is a very real possibility, without us ever knowing the difference, since we are local area light locked in our real vision...
So, since light may be traveling at different velocities, in our observable universe, what's to prove it wasn't traveling at very different velocities, in the pre-quantum, sub-quantum universe? I happen to think it was traveling much slower than present C, in the sub-quantum universe. This would change the entire dynamics of everything we are looking at. It would allow a simple sub-quantum, pre-quantum formation of absolute fundamental space substance, to collect into a first star, by simple hydrodynamics, thus and then producting the real quantum world of electrodynamics, and chromodynamics, if one wishes. You must have the primary wave first, and I say it's a thermo-hydrodynamic wave, or an unlimited many, as the case would be, of fundamental space/matter substance motions..."
And this is the model; "The trouble I see with all classicists, physicists, cosmologists, hydrodynamicists, quantumists, and relativists is trying to see a dynamic universal process with a one dimensional view of wave mechanics, and by one dimensional, I simply mean as a single model view of wave mechanics. To me, the universe is a 3 stage process of wave mechanics; 1.Pre 1st star; 2.Within 1st star; and 3.Post 1st star. I don't believe one single model view of wave mechanics is capable of capturing this dynamic process. Most all of the last hundred years of physics deals only with stages 2. and 3. They all ignore stage 1., and IMO, to their peril, but like I said, let me bring it down to the simple electron model, I see.
Since we both agree it's a FS photonic universe, let the basic aether field be filled with stationary photons___size doesn't matter for this simple model. Now strip your mind of other wave interactions for simplicity's sake. Picture an electron traveling straight through the FS photon sea___any wave/particle traveling through such a sea must increase in mass as it approaches true c. Where does the mass increase come from? The electron must gain photons as mass increase___there's no other source. Velocity and density of the FS photon field require this. Velocity also creates heat. What is being heated, since the electron is also made of photons? The only possible answer is photons___simple logic. Now, what is truly happening inside the electron as it increases photon mass and heat? The electron is acting first as a condensor storage magnetic moment capacitor, then as a radiating generator of electricity moments. What is making up this process? Photons___plain and simple. This all is happening at the speed of light___mass is increasing creating the magnetic moment of the em wave, and then critical mass entropy is reached and the electron radiates/generates its electric moment. This is all photon on photon action, and is the same for all frequencies of light and waves. It's just faster for faster waves, such as gamma rays, and slower for micro-waves. They all must increase in mass proportional to true velocity. We just have trouble distinguishing between true c and sub-c velocities. Nature does it quite easily___just imagine how many entropy cycles in a gamma ray traveling only a short distance. The electron, we seem to know more about, thanks to Maxwell and others, is still frequencies of mass entropy cycles, and the attendent velocities, that create the varrying heats of photons contained and radiated as the heat of mass velocities. I can't imagine why you still think photons don't change temperature, when all is of photons...?"
The above was written long before I ever saw any of your material, I think the comparison is obvious, and I do agree with your model, at this same level. It's just I state it is absolutely real solid FS matter, whether considered by others as energy, waves or what-not, it's FS matter. Now, if you'd like to discuss the four dimensionality of it, that's up to you, but there is no math possible to describe my model or yours___It's the 4-body problem... Maybe this is why physics just gives up, and stays within the safety zone of its 3-D world...
Lloyd
p.s.
Now, do you see why "gravity is the 4th dimension", is a moot point? It can't be mathematically modeled, due to the 4-body problem. At the time of inception, Poincare' couldn't even solve the 3-body problem, and to this day, it may not be solved___one solution is being tested.
And BTW, Einstein's 1905 srt work was what I meant to refer to in my last post... It first showed gravity as the 4th dimension, and the later grt more directly confirmed it. And btw, what's so special about saying gravity is the 4th dimension? That's just plain obvious. So, what causes 4th dimension ground state motion, to begin with?___What's the prime mover? Now, there's a question? And don't say the standard answer, "It's always been." What is the scientific prime mover? There is only one...