[N0B0DY]

"When forced to summarize the general theory of relativity in one sentence:
Time and space and gravitation have no separate existence from matter.

"All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me no nearer to the answer to the question, 'What are light quanta?' Nowadays every Tom, Dick and Harry thinks he knows it, but he is mistaken. … I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be based on the field concept, i.e., on continuous structures. In that case, nothing remains of my entire castle in the air, gravitation theory included, and of the rest of modern physics." (Albert Einstein)

He must have been having a bad day.

You seem to have an aversion towards anyone who conflicts with your absolute thinking, Lloyd. I have to stand behind my conclusion that your FS is BS, not "just because," but because we have to remain consistent in drawing logical conclusions based on localized reference frames that can't possibly exist to the absolute universe. Motion in matter creating time is ass-backwards, because without time there can be no such thing as matter/motion/space. Perhaps one of the greatest geniuses of all time, was honest enough to realize he was barking up the wrong tree of life.

His statements and self-corrective science continually conflicted, but there was always a theme of unifying things that were once thought to be separate. If he had lived long enough, perhaps he too would tackle unifying everything and nothing.

What I see as the main hurdle for you is this: "This is the great problem with quantum mechanics, equal counter forces never negate to zero. Forces must always be FS in motion." F=ma and E=Fd/t, where the carriage is incremental over Planck, equates to zero force at every point. Essentially, you're right, they don't negate to zero. They are zero without the time to produce the observeable effect.

There is no time, Lloyd. It has to be broken up into segments to create incremental time/distance through a reduction of acceleration which in turn creates the acceleration of mass through space. Your matter in motion decreases length, increases mass, and increases time; and for the "fundamental" building blocks of of matter to have what you claim they have - "mass" - it would require an infinite amount of localized energy for it to literally move anywhere, which renders photons motion-less, mass-less and energy-less beyond Planck's universal boundary. Above Planck there is only deceleration of the absolute velocity - at zero - what we can call the creation point of abstract matter.