[Lloyd Gillespie]

".....what's so special about saying gravity is the 4th dimension? That's just plain obvious. So, what causes 4th dimension ground state motion, to begin with?___What's the prime mover? Now, there's a question? And don't say the standard answer, "It's always been." What is the scientific prime mover? There is only one...

(I'm only guessing, Mr. Gillespie, but I think you're alluding to God... You're certainly right in saying 'There is only one', but could you make your enigmatically poignant question a little more user friendly? <Please refer to 'Science "versus" God', in my featured articles here at Theory of Everything> )

RP, if you noticed, I asked "What is the scientific prime mover?". I hardly think that refers to "god." And as far as my statements about gravity, mass, motion, and Einstein, etc., they are posted all over this board, and so far I see no valuable, usable insight in my or anyone else's work, yet, including yours. Re-read what I wrote to you, to get yourself a better grounding in this forum. Your knowledge is nowheres near as important, as you think it is. It's just another, in a long line of gauge invariant models. I think all gauge invariant models are bogus___period, except a possible absolute fundamental substance model, but that leaves the problem of mass-identity. So, now that you know I dis-agree with your views, maybe we could discuss specifics, instead of your foolish personal battle of who owns Einstein's work. It's his, not yours, even if you are the one to state the obvious moot point, "Gravity is the 4th dimension." Like I said, you show me your knowledge of a prime mover of fundamental substance, and I'll be much more impressed, than re-stating Einstein, over and over. And your 5th and 6th dimensions, both fit inside the 4th, and even the 3rd, with difficulty___yet, no true 4-body math...

Something I did notice though, was the fact that if you use the Yin/Yang symbol, just half of it, it could easily fit your diagrams of the traveling em-wave/electron changing orbit, if it were drawn completely in 3D/4D perspective___you know what I mean, a spiraling in or out position tear-drop. Still, what's new?___Quantum mechanics, classical, relative and standard model mechanics covers all this...? If you offered new solutions to the mass problem, then I'd say you had something, but so far, I only see slight extensions of quantum projections, and a truly false gauge invariant cc model. This gauge invariant cc model has been proven false, by hundreds of physicists, over the last twenty years, with just simple matter density facts, logic and experiments. It fails at velocity state space origin, middle universal evolutionary phase state space, and final decay phase state space/matter/motion mechanics, even though gravity is fine for the 4th dimension___What's its original prime mover? You have nothing, until you answer the fundamental matter/motion question___It's all abstract, until...!

Sorry,
Lloyd