| Re: T.o.N. (Theory of Nothing)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lloyd Gillespie  Fredrick, in my languages, you haven't explained a thing about your pyramid model, I can even begin to relate to. I gave you an example of not being able to fit a 4D model into a 3D pyramid, and you made no attempt, that I could relate to, to explain your model's ability to handle 4D space, because your point about looking down on the pyramid, to see all four sides, is still a 3D vision___period. So, if you have such a FS/Motion 4D pyramid model___Show us...? It isn't about static 3-D vision, it's about physical vision in motion 4-Dimensionally...
Lloyd | You are only trying to turn the table on me here. There is nothing static about 3D, as long as one considers the inward-outward direction that should always be included.
The pyramid is simple (but indeed complex in its own way). I provided all the tools. And you are as familiar with the four forces as anyone around. I have no problems if you want to send me a private message to discuss the model and the four forces (and/or find through trial and error what the surprising answer is). Private messages are private; I do not disclose them.
__________________
The difference between a structure based on unification and a structure without unification hinges on the question if nothing is just plain nothing or if nothing is mighty fundamental. Read In Search of a Cyclops with titillating mathematical evidence (see homepage) to find out if separation belongs to the fundamental basics of our universe - or not. |