[N0B0DY]

You do these maths, and you'll quickly see how long it takes real matter to completely decay, and inflate/expand finiteness, to an almost infinity

Forget the observations and the math for a second, Lloyd, and pay attention to what you're saying. From above, we can clearly see that it is not a linguistics problem, but a problem with your logic and others' as well who think the above is logical. You continually, by getting too excited I would say, state things like "almost infinity." If you are serious in wanting me to picture what you are saying, quit it. I like your idea, but if everything doesn't click/fit I file it under "g" because I refuse to forcefit qualities to satisfy preconceived notions.

It's a long, long, time of trillions of years___Don't you think that's long enough for infinity, to infinitesimalize, and move to start the collection process of the infinitesimal/infinite number of particles that truly must make up the FS?

A trillion, trillion, trillion years is a blink of an eye to someone who is dead, but, no, I don't think it's long enough for a circumstantially-impossible sequence of events to occur. You have to make up your mind, Lloyd. If the FS is truly and absolutely unmoving, and its motion provides the creation and functioning of the parts, not even the infinitesimal is allowed to move without violating the law of immovability that you have invoked. This is why, again, I stated in message 1 that there is a difference between infinite and absolute. The absolute "one" doesn't and can't exist, because the absolute implies and requires a total - "absolutely everything" - and the is no total from the infinite perspective.

Nobody, there is no contradiction in saying "matter moves withing matter, and part of the fundamental infinite matter sits still." You only need realize, finiteness is only part of the infinitesimal/infinity, not all of it, yet, the part that's motionless, is also moving within its motionlessness.

Man, oh man....acid trip of repulsive chemical bonding at work. I realize that finiteness is not all of the infinite, but you're thinking too macroscopically when you portray moving bodies within still bodies or still bodies within moving bodies. If you are satisfied with near absolute, near stillness, etc., fine, but don't infer that near absolute is absolute because it is clearly not.

I picture what people say, Lloyd, and your picture aches for a motionless substrate space for your "real" strata to move through. Yet, the functioning you have repeatedly portrayed is based upon the substrate FS creating in waves via contraction. It is like saying there is a give to Planck length, which is a relatively large distance, but through the other side of your mouth saying there is absolutely no distance....motion, no motion, motion, absolutely still, etc..

Think about it, the oceans do it all the time, it's just the mind has linguistic trouble wrapping it's logic around such a simple mechanics of ONE complexity...!!!

Like you just said to me, water is not the FS, and the ocean is far from still, Lloyd. If it moves even slightly, proving micro asymmetry, it is not motionless. We require an ocean from another universe beyond Planck to keep universal symmetry at exactly and absolutely zero. Antimatter is a prerequisite to true physical symmetry, and the result of that physical symmetry just so happens to negate its observable existence to trueand absolute non-existence - motionlessness.

You're still stuck in your abstract mind state, Nobody. Wake-up___It's absolutely real fundamental spirit matter!!!

Perhaps you should go back to sleep, to realize what the first dream is, Lloyd.

Nobody, as I stated above, parts can move, yet overall can sit still, just as we or our minds do, or so, so...

You're really getting somewhere when you invoke the mind, Lloyd. It truly governs the "body." The overall must include the parts, and if the parts move the overall logically moves too. Conversely, if the overall is meant to mean the exterior boundary of "the sphere," the residual waves/radiation of the motion of the internal parts require a give at the boundary - just like the ocean - which equates to it being in motion and infinitely far from being motionless.