[N0B0DY]

Man you got probs, Lloyd.

My interpretation of infinitesimal is based on one definition of infinitesimal, not on insanity, and yours on another. Which one should we use in my thread to portray my picture and the logical decrease of inward boundaries? I would think it logical to use mine, and that was the point I was making until you blew it way out of proportion.

Right to the bottom line, again, because you missed the point the first time around due to your bombardment to protect your stance.

"Come-on Nobody, contraction means___In"

In where, Lloyd? We're not talking about he3/4 or a drop of water, but the infinite universe contracting "in." Which point is in, in an infinite universe? Every point is in, and there would be too much counter pressure from every contractive point of infinity for there to be any literal contraction.

If you can't answer that, then all examples of localized contraction must remain abstract phenomena based on abstract time dilation according to the rate your nervous system processes information. Yes, the abstract neurological phenomenon.

There is no "in" or "out" in an infinite universe, only abstract measurements stringed together incrementally to give the impression of particles in motion through space. So, you are really taking the illusory evidence in lieu of the logical evidence, which I will take until further notice, thanks.

You state you don't conform to standard mainstream, but continue to advocate its means of assessing reality. You claim that bonding doesn't occur from negative charges being drawn toward two positive charges, "it's all repulsive," but then claim that all mechanics are "in" ward based. Seems to be more like "psych" ward to me, Lloyd.

Finally, as far as linguistics problems go, ask anyone in the general public if they think there is such a thing as "unbounded finiteness" or "absolutivity of relativity" and pay close attention to the laughter if you can manage to avoid the eggs. The above private language is an insult to both Einstein and logic, Lloyd, sorry.