DEAR ALL: I don't know why .... but my posts appear to be 'appearing' in any old order.
However ... if this post appears ... Thank you to you all .... I apologise if it seems that I ignored anyone here. This not the case ... perhaps it is because I am downunder and everything is coming up reverse
AUSTIN: yes ... I like your idea of star ownership ... I don't see why it would be any less legal than the 'legal' claims of many former empires who claimed all they found as their own ...
For me .. I see Orion nearly every night ... I may be wrong, I haven't checked any star tables ... but from memory it is always in my sky. I have a preference for Venus ... where, it is said, that Titanium falls as snow .. also I watch it travel to my horizon each night so fast that at times you could mistake it for a plane.
BAUDRUNNER: Thanks for your post ... I like your interpretation of the implications of Bell's Theorem ..... especially ....
Baud "In effect, it supports the quantum idea that everything really is happening at the same time in the same place."
Just for the moment I am trying to stick strictly to the Maths ... I have found that as soon as I start to draw conclusions things start to fall apart again.
I promise to read your blog thoroughly ... just as soon as I get my QM explanation posted in the next post. If I read it now I know I will start to question my ideas immediately. Then I will never be done ....
WILLIE: where the hell are you .... ??