| Re: T.o.N. (Theory of Nothing)
Talking about nothing (heard recently from) ...
Lloyd's information ánd interests may prove to be the lithmus test of this pyramidic model, for if it is possible to place his delivery of infinite fundamental cold scalar waves producing all the finite hot scalar waves inside a comprehensive pyramid of hydrodynamics, we'd be home-free.
I am not the specialist when it comes down to hydrodynamics, so would you, Lloyd, please, try your hand on such a pyramid? In this case, too, we are looking for a generic-specific pair (for instance, hydrodynamic vs. its specific conditions), a transformational pair (for instance, hot vs. cold scalar waves?) plus a grounded oppositional pair (Sorry, I have only general ideas here, such as for instance pressure vs. volume or something like that; other ideas may be more suiting, Lloyd). From your postings, I know you have no problems unifying the various aspects of hydrodynamics. Please, try your hands on this pyramidic delivery and see if you can make it a suitable model.
Lloyd, I sincerely hope the hydrodynamic pyramid can clinch this model as suitable for every delivery — as long as it is a generic delivery. If you know the model, you know there should be six specific designations (with two of them being quite generic), or maybe it should be seven (with seven being the surprise)?
__________________
The difference between a structure based on unification and a structure without unification hinges on the question if nothing is just plain nothing or if nothing is mighty fundamental. Read In Search of a Cyclops with titillating mathematical evidence (see homepage) to find out if separation belongs to the fundamental basics of our universe - or not. |