| Re: T.o.N. (Theory of Nothing) "At the same time, light itself may continue unobstructed into the infinite. Both finite and infinite have their place within that pyramid, and I would say Lloyd's scalar waves do too."
This would be the contradiction, Fredrick, when we are trying to remain logically consistent. If light itself may continue unobstructed, what would be the cause exactly for obstructing part of it?
Lloyd's scalar waves are fine, but in an infinite universe there would be no point in particular for the in waves to contract - which is what his proposition is. If near-zero k has a contractive nature, and near-zero k exists to infinity, all points would contract toward every point. Do you see how that would be impossible?
So I have to remain an advocate of absolute zero, absolute speed, with the standing waves being virtual according to the time it takes for observations and categorizations to be made.
Which, I know, leads to the question of "how can you exist to categorize things if you don't really exist?" It is like proteins being required to make DNA and DNA being required to make proteins. We have to think in terms of the last effect being the first cause, and RNA being the abstract means of producing both.
The point about the king of the north building another pyramid was that even too much is never enough for someone who wants to be king. Desire itself preventing the negation of the ego. |