Originally Posted by N0B0DY  "At the same time, light itself may continue unobstructed into the infinite. Both finite and infinite have their place within that pyramid, and I would say Lloyd's scalar waves do too."
This would be the contradiction, Fredrick, when we are trying to remain logically consistent. If light itself may continue unobstructed, what would be the cause exactly for obstructing part of it? [Nobody, this would be just simple photonic decay.]
Lloyd's scalar waves are fine, but in an infinite universe there would be no point in particular for the in waves to contract [Ah, I beg to differ. One must first realize infinity has, and must have, a shape. It matters not to me what shape you give it, but the fact remains, it possesses a 2-D or 3-D shape, to exist, and we know it exists, so any and all shapes have centers, and further, have and possesses distances from the outside outer most point to the inside inner most point. This can not be denyed, by any logical person. If such a picture be true, then contraction from outside to inside is certainly a real possibilit, is it not?] - which is what his proposition is. [True enough.] If near-zero k has a contractive nature, and near-zero k exists to infinity, all points would contract toward every point. [And what's wrong with that?___As long as the total infinite contraction is also toward a center of its own infinity, also?] Do you see how that would be impossible? [No, no, no, highly possible, and actual. Just imagine any shape, say an apple, contracting to its every infinitesimal point, yet also contracting to its own center. Infinity would be no different than the apple example. Science, and correspondence logic, applies the same to finiteness, as to infinity. And why should it not?]
So I have to remain an advocate of absolute zero, absolute speed, with the standing waves being virtual according to the time it takes for observations and categorizations to be made. [Nobody, would you please study just a few low temperature experiments, so you may learn that near absolute zero does not create absolute speed, but actually the reverse, of a very slow velocity of atomic action___Bose/Einstein condensate, Hau slowed photons, or very slow moving he3 atoms, etc., etc.]
Which, I know, leads to the question of "how can you exist to categorize things if you don't really exist?" [Nobody, quit dreaming your abstract self, from the true positions of absoluteness.] It is like proteins being required to make DNA and DNA being required to make proteins. [No___except, only when you accept such foolish Zeno impossibilities.] We have to think in terms of the last effect being the first cause, and RNA being the abstract means of producing both. [All sensible philosophers have long since realized, Zeno is nothing but bs philosophy.]
The point about the king of the north building another pyramid was that even too much is never enough for someone who wants to be king. Desire itself preventing the negation of the ego. |