| Re: T.o.N. (Theory of Nothing)
Lloyd,
The formula can be likened to POK's 1/0, imo. The can't literally be divided or else it would not remain one. There would be space between the infinitesimal particles. The one requires us to close the gaps between particles to get our one absolute, static state.
This is why I mentioned the difference between absolute and infinite. The absolute one (exterior boundary) and absolute zero (interior point) don't exist, so the infinite fractional functioning of relativity in between must be abstract.
If you want to make believe that the universe has a shape just to say it exists that's up to you, Lloyd, but that is believing in things not logically verified. When we invoke infinity we have to follow the implications, and infinity violates the mechanics by which you say is the cause for the shape. So I would have to disagree and say, no, the universe is formless because it doesn't really exist. People just think it does. The outermost and innermost point are really just pulled right out of a magic hat, Lloyd. So I would also have to say, no, contraction from the outside is impossible unless your universal model is finite. Infinite doesn't work, and both finite and infinite combined don't work. The universe is not an apple.
I've studied many experiements also, Lloyd, and all are misleading. Yet I never concluded that near-zero experiements produce absolute speed. I said I advocate absolute zero equals absolute speed, as well as absolute energy, mass, etc.. And the experiments done by Hau were likened to the photons disappearing, which supports my view. One compared it, if you remember, to a train disappearing into a thread and reappearing out of the other side of the thread. And the DNA, RNA and proteins are basic to biology, Lloyd. My point was that RNA was pulled out of a magic hat as well.
Nobody, "Infinity is the negation of negation." Hegel
Good point here, Lloyd. It much better depicts what I was saying. If the negation of the ego is negated, then the ego knows no bounds. Which is a tad dangerous for life forms, imo. |