Quote:
Originally Posted by N0B0DY  Well, I looked back to post 589 because I was sure that you had said IT is the one that differentiates and measures, but I guess I misread you because now I can see what you're saying.
First, I appreciate that you're one of the few who verifies things through experience and what you say is not just words. And I can appreciate the ancient masters' interpretation of the illusion of duality. Yet they're interpretation of the whole is another "thing" that seems to exist, but doesn't.
It can't exist because when we rid our minds of concepts of duality, we have to rid our minds of concepts of separation. And when we do this, there can no longer be any concept of motion, mass, space, energy, consciousness, etc.. There would be no in itself or outside itself, and this is why I revert to the WuChi (without pole) state to better express my position.
Though, we go back a long way, IC, and there just might be a way to equate the one and zero. Because I agree with pretty much everything else you write, your one might be considered pole-less as well, so we might be debating over a trivial matter. |
NOBODY, Thank You, you honor my Spiritual Teacher who showed me the way and pulled me out of mind and matter. Please say hello to Plato for me - i miss him - and respect him - and wish all the best for him.
Please explain WuChi (without pole) are you referring to the manifest negative and positive poles in creation and the "IS" Unmanifest state beyond them ? Please keep it simple ?