[N0B0DY]

Yeah, that's what I was thinking as well, Fredrick, that when all the aspects are absolutely or centrally-unified, they must be considered abstract. So comparatively, the universe or omniverse follows suit and must be considered abstract when unified.

The rotation was basically just a way to make ends meet, so to speak. If we picture a ball rolling on the ground with an observer on each side, one observer will see the ball rolling from left to right and the the other observer will see it rolling from right to left. If those two perspectives were to merge, the ball couldn't possibly roll. So we could conclude then that from an absolute perspective, because the universe includes all perspectives, there is no rolling ball. So, comparative to this, the existence of particles due to spin are non-existent to the absolute universe; and, similarly, space being dependent upon extensions in any direction, and the absolute perspective simultaneously including all directions, can't very well exist except through the abstract means of relativity.

Perhaps this is why the Higg's Boson will never be observed - it is the theoretically-based spinless absolute "particle."

Ultimately, if we separate our "selves" from the universe; and the universe is literally none, the goal of egolessness becomes the gateway to realizing perfection.