| Re: T.o.N. (Theory of Nothing)
Quote:
Originally Posted by N0B0DY  Now we're getting somewhere. It is promising that we both use the terminology, "there is no single overall position," because then we can focus on the two abstract perspectives of the abstract singular state: one being expansive; and the other contractive. So we can realize that the abstract state represents both the wave/particle perspective, and the motionless medium.
Instead of there being a disproportionate amount of matter/antimatter and postulating "antimatter universes" elsewhere, both "exist" at the same point, but are annihilated instantaneously. | We've been getting somewhere all along, Nobody. No worries there. I am enjoying our communication a lot. And I'd say, Lloyd has some excellent perspectives to offer too, but from my perspective it's mainly the language that gets in the way.
__________________
The difference between a structure based on unification and a structure without unification hinges on the question if nothing is just plain nothing or if nothing is mighty fundamental. Read In Search of a Cyclops with titillating mathematical evidence (see homepage) to find out if separation belongs to the fundamental basics of our universe - or not. |