| Re: T.o.N. (Theory of Nothing) Fredrick,
Unless you have a personal reason for wanting to debate in private, I prefer to share things openly, for whatever it may be worth. So I apologize in advance for going ahead and responding here.
The point you made about talking of literal things within an abstract is a good one, and it is the crux of the moot reasoning of the scientific and general focus of separated parts within a whole. My point, all this time, simply being that if the whole is abstract, then the "everything" divided within it must be abstract too. Eventhough seeming very real from individual perspectives.
The rolling ball perspectives are just that, relative perspectives that the absolute universe doesn't share. There is no longer comparative sides when we invoke the absolute, so as a result both perspectives completely negate each other.
Since, hopefully, we are attempting to make the seemingly complex simple, instead of making simple things more complex the further one delves into these matters, when we apply the above to particle mechanics we can change our conceptions of present-day assumptions solely based on observations. The assumptions of which lead to beliefs that matter "somehow" decided to stop the universal annihilation/creation process and lead to unnecessary complexities, when time dilation can answer questions on all universal phenomena.
We simply have to consider all "points" in the universe as event horizons where time stands absolutely still - the above-mentioned perspectives that really don't exist - but that, importantly, the reason for non-being is that all effects occur simultaneously (what we could call absolute speed). So then matter/energy conservation is seen as a concept of the "past," because there is no matter or energy to conserve, and the abstract perspectives of one and zero can be seen as producing an infinite number of abstract fractions in between.
The picture, imo, is semi-accurately depicted by RascalPuff's explanations, yet I place gravity as the inverse of electromagnetism. So to speak, fractional photons emitted from one particle, are gravitons to neighboring particles; and gravitational time dilation, gravitational mass, and gravitational effects are cumulative infinitesimally. Only to be greatly differentiated because of a forward electromagnetic time perspective, where gravity is considered negligible and only increasing with mass eventhough it is responsible for slowing "time" down for events to be observed to "begin with." |