Quote:
Originally Posted by N0B0DY  Fredrick,
Unless you have a personal reason for wanting to debate in private, I prefer to share things openly, for whatever it may be worth. So I apologize in advance for going ahead and responding here.
The rolling ball perspectives are just that, relative perspectives that the absolute universe doesn't share. There are no longer comparative sides when we invoke the absolute, so as a result both perspectives completely negate each other. |
Okay, if you don't mind, I will discuss my concerns in the open with you — even though I consider it mainly a matter of semantics, possibly better addressed in private. The universe contains only relative perspectives. We agree the overall absolute does not exist, yet we appear to differ how to word the remaining picture of relative aspects, them being the only parts. As I see it, the parts do not negate each other, rather they exist within their own realm, and may exist in some state of balance where both supporting and negating one another does occur. Negating is an option, but it is not the overall condition.
If we take the male and the female as expressions, or the young and the old, then these aspects do not negate each other, rather they are based on themselves and we find dynamics between them. Sure, aspects of negating occur, but the overall picture shows the individual aspects, with them being based on their own realm. The overall picture is one of dynamics.
The rolling ball exists absolutely, but we cannot give it an absolute direction based on all observers standing in different positions. Still, the ball rolls in one direction only. The two (or more) perspectives cannot be negated because they do not belong to the ball, they belong to the observers. Position is cue, and to complete this picture, the ball and the observers are all objects (and observers) too.
To bring this back to the images of human beings of female, male, young, and old, each is specific and that is the universal code — being specific.