[N0B0DY]

Fredrick,

When you say: "Negating is an option, but it is not the overall condition." I have to disagree based on our past agreement that the overall position is abstract. So, instead, I have to conclude that the overall condition of all relative conditions can only result in absolute negation.

Your people analogies, although helpful in certain instances, don't really depict negatable perspectives. Although, if I asked you whether or not a man or woman who had a sex change is a man or woman, or if a 21-year-old male or female is old or young, what would your answer be?

Of course, just like the direction of my rolling-ball analogy, we are not negating the existence of age or sex. They are used only to portray negatable factors - young/old, male/female, right/left - in order to facilitate an understanding.

For us to venture into the more confusing negation of existence in its entirety, we have to invoke an abstract universal perspective, whereby we would then ask the universe which direction it is moving; which sex it is; or what age it is. If you catch my drift, it is relatively easy to realize that the universe moves in all directions, is both sexes, and all ages, simultaneously - which is understandably a ridiculous notion. So I just conclude that the absolute universe doesn't move, is neither sex, and is ageless.

Ultimately, the brutal reality is that there is no reality outside of potential reality, which hasn't happened yet and has already happened - same exact state. So in between these "two abstract states" (really one or rather no state, to be clear) there can only be an abstract gravitational time dilation that slows absolute speed down to produce this seeming evolutionary procession, which in turn produces observers with the sensory perception based on neurological effects that are set according to subconscious reactions to subatomic stimuli. The cumulative effects of which, are consciously interpreted as macroscopic reality.