| Re: T.o.N. (Theory of Nothing) "I expect many people to be able to find a lot in common of their thinking with this TOE (with possibly only small parts as unacceptable or not perfectly fitting)."
It's great communicating with you too, Fredrick. So far I've only had a few folks like yourself willing to absorb what is useful to them, and then sharing their new larger pictures.
I have to say that, like myself, you are going to be going up against alot of people promoting a model based on an abstract absolute and a literal separation of quantities and qualities. For myself, I tried to fit your positions into my picture based on the slac experiments in message 1. Which to me implies the properties of light (which I have proven to myself cannot literally exist) creates the relative properties of all particles.
You've done well enough for me to get my head around why white is the same as just another mixed color, but you'll have to go deeper into why the separated primary colors exist of themselves. Just as physicists will have to explain their reasons for ascribing intrinsic properties to electrons and positrons, for example.
Perhaps you could use the spectrum with black on both sides and the colors in the middle. I was thinking that when point A and B - black to black - come together we have white; and when separated, all colors become black. This would essentially render white and black different forms of the same (?), dependent upon distance. Where blacking out parts of the visible spectrum produces different colors.
Something like that, if you will. |