Quote:
Originally Posted by N0B0DY  Fredrick,
Pertaining specifically to your dna model, everything seems to fit in quite well, but it wasn't clear to me whether or not it depicts an intrinsic dna like the color model. Perhaps you could explain where the rna fits in, as well as how the four colors of the color pyramid originate. I see that the dna and the four colors, the way I see them anyway, aren't intrinsic at all. |
Cool, Nobody, but I think you need to be part of that team, too. And you are right about relativity being the norm (with what is
absolute existing on the inside of that what is
relative). I am even starting to believe, after reading his post a few times more, that Lloyd is in reality on the same side of the issue as we are; language may be the explanatory reason here for discrepancies/transgressions/misunderstandings.
The model is an abstract, just like math is abstract. Math happens to be called 'the language in which god speaks to us,' and I consider that to be a truth. The abstract is the ultimate ruler, yet may only rule when truly befitting reality. We should not be looking for science fiction to rule, but for the comprehensive scientific abstract. I view the model of the pyramid as math, just using a different language that is more comprehensive (but this limits it at the same time; the pyramid is only to be used for an overall delivery). The
color pyramid shows the forces, and they are of such magnitude we find five forces at the end (W/S/E/M/G). The
DNA pyramid has only four specific members, and seems like we cannot use it for the forces. We could of course assign a fifth part, for instance, that being the encapsulating matter of DNA, or that being the overall result that the sum is more than the parts. Yet it may be better to say that no fifth part exists in both pyramids.
Of the five forces, we would then say that one is non-exitent (—> gravity), and that it rather belongs to the synergy effect of the parts. That means that also the top of the pyramid is a non-existing part, just like the tip of the pyramid on the one dollar bill is detached from the large base. Only the four corners exist, possibly repeated on a higher level various times, but a fifth part does not exist — it only appears to be there due to this repetition. White is nothing but the accumulation of the colors; there is no color in top, only the accumulation exists. Accumulation of color in opposite position of absence of color (black).
I used both the DNA delivery and the 'human being' delivery of the pyramid, for both are true. They do not conflict with each other in the model, yet they are different in that DNA may show four bases with just one set of separation (the four are based on being bases), while male, female, old, and young show two sets of separation (the four are based on gender and age). They both still function in this model because they deliver information of an overall nature.
DNA are packages, and they are quite stubborn in how they are formed (just one molecule makes the difference between DNA and RNA — see how uracil and thymine are built). So there is not much extra's in this pyramid, yet as we all know, there is an incredible abundance of diversity out there thanks to DNA. If you wish, we could call human beings packages also (packages of life form), but these packages are expressed packages, not building blocks (unless seen as building blocks of society). The internal single separation that exists on the level of the building blocks becomes a double separation in the fully expressed packages.
I'd like to also show how I see the universe, using the idea of how the television functions. I see our universe as a gigantic 3D television set. All is energy (e=mcc). Yet what I find interesting about this analogy is that there is a source for the energy as well. Do I think we can find the cable to unplug the 3D TV? Yes, I think we are getting a good grip on the cord, but if we decide to pull the plug (we are a curious bunch, and we may do it just to see what happens), then still that would not end the universe. At most I think we'll zap the solar system. Even if all we do is turn off the energy source, do we disappear? No, because if you turn off the TV, the TV does not disappear either, just the images disappear, not the hardware.
Where does the 3D TV come from? From the factory, which happens to be not here, but there. It makes no sense for the people in the TV to understand the energy source. By unplugging the cord, we learn nothing extra about where the energy comes from, we only learn what not to do next time, 5 billion years from now (though we forget...). How the TV got into being, however, is a different question we
can answer. Materialization was able to appear on this side for the option was created — through the phenomenon of nothing. The other side is everywhere, but there is nothing the other side can do about our side (or about temporarily becoming part of our side). At most, the other side can possibly influence the
overall picture a tiny bit, but not more, and not too much in specific.
So, we do seem to share the idea that we are living in an unfinished universe... Should we then take it one step further and try to form a team?