[EventHypothesis2006]

Time does exist. Space does exist. They are both aspects of general zone of energy
within which our universe exists.

Go to ------------- for more information. (spam link removed)
Event Hypothesis Quickie Summary:

The nature of time and space has been of much intrigue to great philosophers over many centuries. Today no one still seems to know exactly what it is , though some has had their suspicions . This thesis seeks to help to explain what it is by building upon our present knowledge, without much speculations. True, you might find some of this thesis a bit radical, but I do not think there are any logical inconsistencies.
To date the thesis of Einstein showed that there is a relationship between mass and energy.This is not an extension to the Special or General Theory of Relativity , but rather I say such theories helped pave the way to this hypothesis. I propose to show by an elementary analysis in this thesis that there also is a relationship between Space, Time and Energy , and that Space and Time are both aspects of the same thing That is , Space and Time are both manifestations of Energy!!The suspicion that there was a relationship between Space and Time is not a new one. I think there are many misconceptions about what a space time graph really represents. However,the postulate that both space and time are manifestations of energy is what is new !It is my postulate that a notion of space as a measurement of a void of nothing is inconsistent . A notion of time only as the period of duration of the Earth spinning on its axis and around the Sun is outdated.
My hypothesis proposes in its broad sense that the universe is in a zone of energy and that we experience space and time according to the rate this energy is distributed to us. In Physics , Power is the term that we use for the rate of distribution of energy. In essence in this elementary analysis, Time is the term we use to describe our feeling of duration , of the distribution of this energy to us according to power when we are not moving. On the other hand Space is the term we use to describe our feeling of duration of the distribution of energy according to power when we are moving. The main difference between space and time in this zone of energy then is motion !

Given that S= Space (length)
t = Time (duration in Seconds)
V = Velocity ( Velocity in meters per second)
Space and Time are joined by the simple relationship:

S = Vt
Given that an event occurs and that there was a change in energy signifying that the event did occur, we can call this change in energy E

If we let Kp be the inverse power constant for that event then:
Units of Kp are Watts –1 or Joules –1 and so on

It can be shown that the experienced time duration of that event can be expressed according to the formula
t= KpE
This shows we experience time as a direct relationship according to energy distributed to us from the energy of the event according to its power.. In this relationship, the time of our duration is a definite quantity and of a definite duration dependent only on the quantity of energy change or energy used . Similarly,if we were moving in space for this period of time, the quantity of space propagated would be of a definite quantity ,according to the quantity of energy used. I think this is reasonable and it is within the daily experience of everyone!! Also the more work that is needed to be done, the more energy is needed. When that energy is done if you need to do some more work then you need to get more energy to do it.

BUT more generally
t = KpT
where T is the term used to describe a general zone of energy in which our universe exists :
The Limits of T have not been defined in this thesis , but this formular then proposes that if we should have a CONTINEOUS zone of energy infinite in extent, then the duration, t of that event would similarly be infinite !!

This embodies the notion of Newton’s first Law of Motion … which stipulates that a body will continue at rest or uniform motion in a straight line unless acted upon by a force.
By making this new Hypothesis, the notion of inertia is explained. That is , the tendency of a body to continue moving once its initial energy has run out is explained in this hypothesis , by the postulate which proposes that it is being fed energy from a universal source termed T, STENERGY . .. Short for Space Time Energy , (Ok.. Ok .. I proposed another names as in TAM … short for “Time dam” and then as the postulate progressed I thought of STAM as in “Space , Time, dam” and could also serve to imply a shortened version of STAMINER implying the energy factor)
The relationship
S = Vt
can now be more accurately be replaced by :
S = V KpT
Similarly by this proposition a body once in motion will also describe space indefinitely according to the source of energy T, ie STENERGY, though according to its original power, which determined V.
The elementary analysis then proposes that the relationship
Vt = S ie VKpT = S
has a deeper meaning : It is a statement of the principle of conservation of energy , in a conversion of “Time Energy” (Energy in Time as experienced through our sences as “ duration time” in seconds, minutes etc) into “ Space Energy” (Energy in Space the conversion of which is evidenced in terms of distance traveled , volume and so on) fuelled by T ( STENERGY), at a given power dependent upon what there was before the original energy ended . A likely consequence of such reasoning then proposes that space then is not just a void of emptiness but a representation of this converted energy,
from STENERGY. It was elementary to show that STENERGY supports velocity, mass ,acceleration, forces, etc.
Given that the representation is correct, for any particular zone of T , in that particular zone our awareness of Space and Time are not absolute but may be subject to changes by the influence of other energy sources which can generate power. Hereby the Hypothesis also proposes the possibility that fields of influence such as magnetic Fields, Electric Fields, Gravitational Fields if they generate power could affect both our awareness of Time and or Space.
Based on the analysis I was able to come to a bold new and more meaningful definition of Time as:

“Nevertheless it is possible to come to a unified definition of time based on the concept of power.For example :
we could now define time as the name given to a natural energy, which fuels constant motion,(This natural energy also accommodates velocity, forces, acceleration etc.) and of which we perceive as a feeling of duration, of one second , at a power of one watt, (in a given frame of reference ) for a change in energy of one Newton meter. “

For example if we were in this field of energy generating power to us at a rate of 1 watt and we ourselves had energy and we were able to change our energy from say 200 Joules of energy to say 201 Joules of energy then we would experience the notion of duration of what we call a time of 1 second , in that given plane of reference.

Similarly another definition for Space within the context of S = v t

Another way of defining space could be as follows:

The name given to a natural energy which fuels constant motion.( This Energy and also accommodates acceleration, force, ect) and of which we perceive as a the feeling of space duration of One Meter for a unit change in velocitized energy , at a power of one watt .(In a given frame of reference )

Put another way we are saying that if we were in a field of energy that was generating
its power to us at a rate of 1 watt, and we ourselves had energy and we were moving at a constant velocity and we were able to change our energy from one state to another by a value , such that the product of the change in energy and the constant velocity is equal to unity, then we would experience the notion of “ space duration “ which we call 1 meter, in that frame of reference.

Again to the technically astute we see that the difference between what we perceive as 1 second as against 1 meter is a matter of whether we are speaking about Energy Change in a field of energy generating power or Velocitized Energy Change in this same field of energy generating this same power!! Technically speaking also, since it has already be hypothesized that all things are in constant motion , the question could arise as to whether on not when we attempt to define time, do we not also have velocitized energy ? If this is so , then what is the difference between Time and Space ?
(Velocitized energy was used to convey the idea of movement , which creates separation, implying the creation of space, but philosophically, the fundamentals behind space are energy , change and power)


C Copyright 2006 – 2007 Event Hyothesis 2006 . Intellectual property. No part(s) reproduced or distributed without prior distinct permission of the author