[N0B0DY]

Fredrick,

Not that I wouldn't be honored to be on your team, but I'm of an opposite view. It goes against my religion, so to speak.

I don't think there are such things as tangible things, and that assumes an opposite stance of pretty much everybody. I think space, particles, energy, etc., are created by the subconscious mind as a particular set of parameters and that the conscious mind is the scientist/mathematician. The closest I could come to explain it summarily is that the absolute state has no choice but to divide itself (0/0), and that division breeds its binary opposite (1) which in turn breeds an infinite number of abstract increments between 1 and 0. Abstract because there is no difference, contextually, to the absolute 1 and absolute 0.

The subconscious mind governs the variable arrangements of subatomic particles, which in turn are observed, calculated, interpreted, and categorized by the conscious mind at detectible levels. The subconscious governs the appropriate amount of energy/matter required for a body and mind to persist to exist according to their specific parameters. And this can function abstractly while eliminating chicken and egg scenarios, along with all false paradoxes, which is more than literal models or concepts that crystallize nature can say.

That is why I like your model, and entertain your ideas with mine, because there is an abstract aspect to it. Nevertheless it represents a particular functioning and format that has to fit into my own understanding of things so I questioned the dna and colors to get an idea of how they arise, if not from a division of the accumulated or unified whole. The four colors or four bases have to consist of something which consists of something else which consists of something else, in order for them to be relative. In the context of this thread, relative is the opposite of absolute - http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/relative - and therefore the colors and bases can't be considered primary or intrinsic.

We can use a deck-of-cards pyramid: with all cards mixed at the top, adding a deck and removing one card at a time as we go down the center of the pyramid until we have no cards left; and from the bottom center, starting with one card according to one suit, and adding one card towards each corner until we have a complete suit at each corner. Now I might be stupid, but I don't see anything remotely intrinsic anywhere in the pyramid except for perhaps the bottom center. Yet, even that is dependent upon the cards, contextually, because cards are required for there to be a lack of them.

So, when I asked for the reason why primary colors are primary, I don't want to know why they would be independent of the color name tag or independent of all colors, but if one particular shade is primary or not. What do the colors consist of?

For the television example, I'm interested in what the hardware consists of because I think the energy that powers the projections is the same that creates the raw materials. That the whole set is a perpetual machine based on binary fluctuations of absolute space - the one and zero perspectives.