| Re: moving vs. stationary fields
Re: moving vs. stationary fields - 01-08-2007, 06:23 PM
"Excellent thread starter Antonio,you are absolutely right there ,it is the etheric field in
which all universal manifestation has its being,this "etheric field" is stationary for one very
good reason,it is ubiquitous by nature,thereby have no use for motion?But it provides
the medium for all transactions and interactions of universal energy motioning.
The main difficulty in detecting this etheric universal field,is in the fact that it is ever so
slightly "out of phase" with the continuum as we understand it."
________________________________________
It seems that you gentlemen have resolved - if not rekindled - what, in view of your considerations, may or not be paradoxical. Namely, Locke's statement that 'Two or more things cannot occupy the same space simutaneously' (paraphrased).
Your mutual approach to the issues and its focus on field phenomena may indeed be the exception to that proclamation, insofar as, field phenomena - as applied to the universe en toto - may rightfully be interpreted as a continuous interconnection of all 'things' apparent.
Please express your thoughts on this consideration.
Thank you for the thought provoking posts.
Best regards,
- RP
__________________
(George Berkeley, 1710) ... lay the beginning in a distinct explication of what is meant by thing, reality, existence: for in vain shall we dispute concerning the real existence of things, or pretend to any knowledge thereof, so long as we have not fixed the meaning of those words.
"All things come out of the one and the one out of all things." - Heraclitus
"Reality is an illusion - albeit a persistent one." - Einstein
"Particles give me a headache." - Ibid
Last edited by RascalPuff; 05-29-2007 at 02:19 PM.
Reason: Addition of italics to Michael's statement.
|