[N0B0DY]

I think we're getting closer to my point, and I would like to say that I was first interested in your proposition - it caught my eye - because of the unique mechanism of describing gravity.

Yet, there is a difference in discounting air resistance to explain a mechanism, and it being discounted as a by product of the mechanism.

Einstein's gravity is based on space contracting toward the center of mass, so air resistance obviously has to be discounted; yours is based on space expanding outward, so air resistance is not a factor at all.

To put the question another way: why is air resistance not even a factor to be ignored according to your proposition?

To explain my position another way: a feather that falls, falls not in quotes, is resisted by the air; whereas a feather that "falls" cannot be resisted. There would be no such phenomenon as air resistance per your mechanism.