View Single Post
Re: Physical Matter is Six Simultaneous Euclidien Dimensions
Old
  (#28 (permalink))
RascalPuff
Aka the White Mongol
RascalPuff has a spectacular aura about
 
RascalPuff's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,449
Thanks Given: 87
Thanked 80x in 76 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2007
Rep Power: 20
   
Awards Showcase
2nd Place - Monthly Theme Quiz 
Total Awards: 1
Re: Physical Matter is Six Simultaneous Euclidien Dimensions - 05-30-2007, 05:07 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by N0B0DY View Post
Most folks respond with insults when they become stuck, but I didn't think you were of the same stock.

At any rate, I'll put it yet another way: if the presently-accepted notion of gravity were to be correct, the earth would be rotating clockwise due to friction; if your notion of gravity were to be correct, the earth would be swallowed by the sun - any type of friction wouldn't be a factor.
____________________________

Re: Physical Matter is Six Simultaneous Euclidien Dimensions - Yesterday, 08:32 PM


Re: Physical Matter is Six Simultaneous Euclidien Dimensions - Today, 08:15 PM 5/29/07



Quote:
Originally Posted by RascalPuff
In the three page preface to Newton's Principia, the author offers that gravity 'may be a repelling force' (in those words). A coupla centuries later, Einstein's General Principle flatly and elaborately states that gravity is a repelling force.
Is that professional enough for you, sir?

___________________________________

My copy of Newton's principia must be in error; I see no such remark. Are you sure you are not quoting one of your infamous web sites of bogus info?



David
________________________________________

Your copy of Newton's Principia is either incomplete, or you've over looked the bottom of page two and the top of page three of the Preface. There's only three pages to Preface, so you should be able to manage it. It's in every library and every language in the world. Your reputation against mine is what you've wagered here, sir, with your feral, unqualified, name calling 'bogus' terminology.
However many people are reading these posts are the number of witnesses to the fact that what I call Newton's 'gravitational alternative' - that gravity is either an impelling or a repelling force, in those words, is in the three page Preface to the Principia, as described.
(You really ought to be more careful what you commit yourself to and what you say in public, Mr. dleviwing. You could lose your reputation for credibility if you don't restrain yourself from speaking so harshly and hastily... You could become infamous the way you're carrying on, sir.)

Regards
- RP


(George Berkeley, 1710) ... lay the beginning in a distinct explication of what is meant by thing, reality, existence: for in vain shall we dispute concerning the real existence of things, or pretend to any knowledge thereof, so long as we have not fixed the meaning of those words.

"All things come out of the one and the one out of all things." - Heraclitus
"Reality is an illusion - albeit a persistent one." - Einstein
"Particles give me a headache." - Ibid

Last edited by RascalPuff : 05-30-2007 at 05:09 AM. Reason: Streamling
  
Reply With Quote